Beta Decay: Why Isomeric State Has Long Half-Life

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Please look at the attached file.

The first part of the question: why it doesn't decay to the GS. I think that's simply because the nuclear spin changes by 4 and therefore this decay is very supressed.

But how "is it possible for the isomeric state at 140kev which decays by gamma emisson, to have a half life of several hours." (ie. a half life comparable to the original state (Mo) decaying to the allowed excited of Tc. Any tips on what approach I can take to show this?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Beta Decay.jpg
    Beta Decay.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 535
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

It can decay into its ground state, however it is less probable, however the decay pathways are generally toward the next lower energy spin state until the ground state is reached.

The reason why it is 'negligible' is because of the extreme energy difference between the energy levels of 1.21 Mev -> 0.14 Mev, where the 0.14 Mev energy level is extremely close to the ground state energy level. The spin states are also a factor, the difference in energy levels in a decay of one spin state into its ground spin state.
[/Color]
 
Orion1 said:
The spin states are also a factor, the difference in energy levels in a decay of one spin state into its ground spin state.
[/Color]

thanks for your reply Orion1. I would have thought the difference in spin states is the main reason - I mean nuclear spin changes by 4 (if there was a transition to the ground state). Its the fourth forbidden transition so it would be very, very supressed.

What about the second part of the question: any thoughts on how to show it has a half life of several hours?
 


In simplest terms, if the decay slope is linear, the half life is proportional to the difference in energy between the two spin states.

\frac{T_{\frac{1}{2} a}}{T_{\frac{1}{2} b}} \propto \frac{Q_{\beta1}}{Q_{\beta2}}

T_{\frac{1}{2} b} \propto T_{\frac{1}{2} a} \left( \frac{Q_{\beta2}}{Q_{\beta1}} \right) = 66 \; \text{hrs} \left( \frac{0.14 \; \text{Mev}}{1.21 \; \text{Mev}} \right) = 7.636 \; \text{hrs}

\boxed{T_{\frac{1}{2} b} = 7.636 \; \text{hrs}}

The remaining difference being due to the effects of differential spin states.

\boxed{T_{\frac{1}{2} b} = 7.636 \; \text{hrs} - \Delta S \cdot 0.409 \; \text{hrs}}
[/Color]
 
Last edited:
presently my research filed is beta spectroscopy in light nuclei near the drip line.
If you are interested in it, please contact with me,.
 
Last edited:
Many thanks Orion1:)

monkey this is a past finals question. I'm just revising for exams!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top