Bicycle Translational Acceleration vs Angular Acceleration

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between translational and angular acceleration in bicycles, particularly how to calculate the minimum force required at the pedals for the rear wheel to begin accelerating. A key point is that the torque from the chain must exceed the static friction torque for angular acceleration, leading to a calculated requirement of 50 N at the pedals. However, it is noted that even a small force can initiate translational acceleration due to static friction, raising questions about the apparent contradiction between the two forms of acceleration. Participants emphasize the need to consider the pedal gear and chain dynamics in the analysis, as well as the importance of using free body diagrams to clarify the forces and torques involved. The conversation highlights the complexity of these calculations and the necessity for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanics at play.
  • #121
This thread is in an endless loop, and is going nowhere. I am temporarily closing it.

Jbriggs444, haruspex, and I have agreed to collaborate on developing a complete analysis of this problem, which we will post once we have completed it. Immediately after that, the thread will be permanently closed. Hopefully, this will answer all UMath1's questions, and provide all the answers he/she desires. If not, all we can say is that we've done the best we could. There will be no further responses allowed in this thread.

Chet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
This Bicycle Mechanics Analysis was developed by collaboration between jbriggs444, haruspex, and chestermiller. We all concur on its contents.

Moment Balance on Rear Wheel Assembly:

$$(T_U-T_L)R_{RS}-F_{SR}R_W=I_Rα\tag{1}$$
where

##T_U## = Tension in upper part of the chain
##T_L## = Tension in lower part of the chain
##R_{RS}## = Radius of rear sprocket
##F_{SR}## = Static friction force exerted by ground on rear wheel in forward direction
##R_W## = Radius of wheels
##I_R## =Moment of inertia of rear wheel assembly
##α## = Angular acceleration of wheels

Moment of Inertia of Rear Wheel
$$I_R=m_RR_W^2\tag{2}$$
where

##m_R## = mass of rear wheel assembly

Eqn. 2 makes the reasonable approximation that all the mass of the wheel assembly is concentrated at the rim.

Kinematic Equation Between Angular Acceleration of Wheels and Forward Acceleration of Bike
$$α=a/R_W\tag{3}$$
where a is the acceleration of the bike and rider.

Combining Eqns. 1-3 for Rear Wheel Assembly Moment Balance
$$(T_U-T_L)R_{RS}-F_{SR}R_W=m_RR_Wa\tag{4}$$

Moment Balance on Pedal Assembly (neglecting rotational inertia of pedal sprocket assembly)
$$τ_P=(T_U-T_L)R_{PS}\tag{5}$$
where

##τ_P=## = Torque applied by rider to pedal sprocket
##R_{PS}## = Radius of pedal sprocket

Moment Balance on Front Wheel Assembly
$$F_{SF}R_W=m_FR_Wa\tag{6}$$
where

##F_{SF}## = Static friction force exerted by ground on front wheel in backward direction
##m_F## = mass of front wheel assembly

Overall Force Balance on Bike and Rider
$$F_{SR}-F_{SF}=Ma\tag{7}$$
where

##M## = combined mass of bike and rider

Solution of Equations and Results
Equations 4-7 constitute a complete mathematical statement of our bicycle mechanics model. Our objective now will to be to use these equations to derive relationships for the:
  • acceleration of the bike expressed as a function of the pedal torque applied by the rider
  • static friction force on the rear wheel expressed as a function of the pedal torque applied by the rider
  • static friction force on the rear wheel expressed as a function of the tension difference between the upper part of the chain and the lower part of the chain
If we combine Eqns. 4 and 5 to eliminate the tension difference between upper and lower portions of the chain, we obtain:
$$τ_P\frac{R_{RS}}{R_{PS}}-F_{SR}R_W=m_RR_Wa\tag{8}$$
Combining this with Eqns. 6 and 7 yields:
$$(M+m_R+m_F)R_Wa=τ_P\frac{R_{RS}}{R_{PS}}\tag{9}$$
Note from Eqn. 9 that including the rotational inertia of the wheel assemblies in the analysis is equivalent to increasing the total mass of the bike and rider (which already includes the mass of the wheel assemblies) by the mass of the wheel assemblies a second time. If we solve equation for the acceleration a, we obtain:
$$a=\frac{τ_P}{R_W(M+m_R+m_F)}\frac{R_{RS}}{R_{PS}}\tag{10}$$
If we substitute Eqn. 10 into Eqn. 8, we obtain the following relationship for the static frictional force on the rear wheel as a function of the torque applied by the rider on the pedal:
$$F_{SR}=\frac{τ_P}{R_W}\frac{R_{RS}}{R_{PS}}\frac{(M+m_F)}{(M+m_R+m_F)}\tag{11}$$
We can also express the static frictional force in terms of the tension difference between the upper part of the chain and the lower part of the chain (for whatever that's worth) by solving Eqn. 5 for ##τ_P## and substituting the result into Eqn. 11 to obtain:
$$F_{SR}=\frac{(T_U-T_L)R_{RS}}{R_W}\frac{(M+m_F)}{(M+m_R+m_F)}\tag{12}$$

The mass ratio term in Eqn. 12 captures the effect haruspex was referring to in his responses when he indicated that the frictional torque "lags" behind the propulsive torque.

This completes our analysis.

jbriggs444, haruspex, chestermiller
 
  • Like
Likes artyb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K