How does a bigger aperture allow for better image resolution in telescopes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter semc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    telescope
semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


My prof mentioned that if a telescope has a bigger aperture, you can generally resolve the image better. He did mentioned the reason but I kinda forget the reason so can someone tell me why bigger aperture allows you to better resolve images??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
semc said:

Homework Statement


My prof mentioned that if a telescope has a bigger aperture, you can generally resolve the image better. He did mentioned the reason but I kinda forget the reason so can someone tell me why bigger aperture allows you to better resolve images??

It has to do with diffraction.The larger the aperture the smaller the diffraction images.Try googling for details.
 
Since telescope images faraway objects, at the aperture the incident field is the Fourier transform of the (2D) object to be imaged, an aperture serves to FILTER this spectrum of the object, the bigger the aperture, the more spatial spectrum is allowed, and the lens serve to RECONSTRUCT the object from its filtered spectrum. Since a point source, after filtering, spreads out a little, the heavier the filtering, the more spread-out the image is.
 
Well yea I know the diffraction limit. But my prof mentioned something about filtering high frequency will filter out the details of your image resulting in a blurred image. I just don't understand why a bigger lens will allow high frequency to pass through.
 
The wavefront U(p,q) at the plane of the aperture is the Fourier transform of the object plane U0(x,y),
U(p,q)~∫ ∫ dx dy U0(x,y)exp(i(p*x+q*y))
The aperture A(p,q) of radius a such that
A(p,q)=1, if √(p^2+q^2)<a; A(p,q)=0 otherwise
will multiply the wavefront U, i.e., U'(p,q)=A(p,q)*U(p,q), effectively filter out higher frequencies than a.
The lens does the job of inverse FT from U'(p,q) back to U0'(x,y), which is low-pass filtered with respect to U0.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top