Big Bertha: German Gun that Shelled Paris

  • Thread starter Thread starter runner1738
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    German Gun
AI Thread Summary
Big Bertha, a German artillery piece from World War 1, was used to shell Paris with a shell speed of 1.22 km/s at a high angle of 85.3 degrees. The calculated distance the shell traveled was approximately 0.0248 km, which was confirmed as correct. There was confusion regarding the time of flight calculations, with participants discussing the use of horizontal velocity components and trigonometric functions. The importance of consistent unit usage (kilometers vs. meters) was emphasized, as discrepancies arose from unit conversions. Ultimately, the participants agreed on the correctness of the distance calculation while seeking clarification on the time calculation method.
runner1738
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
During World War 1, the Germans had a gun called Big Bertha that was used to shell Paris. the shell had an initial speed of 1.22 km.s at an initial inclination of 85.3 degrees to the horizontal. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2. How far did the shell hit? Answer in units of km.
i got that answer to be .0248055472 km and that was right then i tried
visin(theta)/g=t, and i got 124.0711849 as my time, but that wasnt right? then what equation do i use? thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must use the horizontal component of the initial velocity, because you found the horizontal distance traveled. Use the angle value and trigonometry to find it.
 
vxi=1.22cos(85.3)=.099649805, so then the distance is 24.8055472 m, and i still don't see how you use trig to get t?
 
Watch your units and make sure you use either meters or kilometers consistently. I meant use trig to find the horizontal component of velocity, but I now see you've already done that. Now remember that

v=\frac{\Delta d}{\Delta t}

and solve for t. (Hint: this is a gun, and the distance is short; it's going to be quick.)
 
d=.0248055472 which is right, is vxi = 1.22(vi)cos(85.3)? cause when i did .0248055472/.0999649805=.2481423702 wasnt right and i only have one more try
 
both the 1.22 and the distance are in km
 
Highly weird. That's the answer I get. The only thing I could think of is that this program or whatever you're using requires rules regarding significant digits to be respected, but your previous answer was accepted and it was unrounded, so I'm not sure. Perhaps someone else will see what we're missing.
 
this is the answer it has recorded for 9) 0.0248055, i seriously think this program is off sometimes even a little bit cause I've gotten a lot of close answers but none that are exactly what it was on the computer
 
but in your mind my answer is correct right? the .248141898 s? casue if it is I am going to go into his office hours and show him that i had it right
 
  • #10
Yes, that is the answer I get. Explain your method to your prof, perhaps he knows something we don't, but this is how I would do the problem, and the answer seems reasonable.
 
  • #11
ill see what his answer is at midnight then get back to you so you can see how he did it
 
  • #12
someone suggested 0=1.22sin(85.3)-(9.8)(t), and i got .1240711849 which was my first answer
 
  • #13
correct answer was 248.142 how is that s, cause i had that answer but it was .248142, why did they turn the km in m, shouldn't it not have made a differnece?
 
  • #14
Hm. The suggestion in post #12 is incorrect because the horizontal component of the velocity of the projectile is constant and unaffected by gravitational acceleration.

Alright, the answer listed was the same but with the decimal moved over, so don't worry too much. You are right, it should not make a difference if you use kilometers or meters as long as you are consistent throughout the problem. I'm not sure how they got that answer. I wonder what your prof will say about the method (hey, I'm learning too!).
 
  • #15
we all are but that is just what is making me is i got .248142 and the real answer according to the computer was 248.142
 
  • #16
no i messed up my answer for 9 was 24.8055 , cause it was in km not m and then divide by the vxi which was .0999649 and got the answer i should have gotten
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
35
Views
7K
Back
Top