Big Test Prep- Questions (2 of 3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom McCurdy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done on an object as it moves from x=0 to x=3X_o, using two methods: plotting the force function and evaluating the integral analytically. The force function is expressed as F=F_0(X/X_o-1), and participants clarify the correct interpretation of the force function's notation. They derive the work done using both the area under the curve method and integration, confirming that the results align. The final answer for the work done is expressed as (3/2)F_oX_o. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise notation in mathematical expressions.
Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
1
Big Test Prep-- Questions (2 of 3)

Alright we are having a review test and I needed to go back to the stuff we did earlier this year and I am having some trouble remembering what to do...
:shy: how can i forget this stuff you ask... I don't know


The Force exerted on an object is F=F_0(X/X_o-1) Find the work done in movieng the object from x=0 to x=3X_o

a. by plotting F(x) and finding the area under the curve and

b. by evaluting the intergral analytically.

Answer: \frac{3}{2}F_oX_o
 
Physics news on Phys.org
W = int (F(x)dx)

Remember that F0 and X0 are both just constants.
 
If you were to integrate that assuming xo and fo are constants would you not get

FoX(X-Xo)
----------
2Xo
 
Tom McCurdy said:
If you were to integrate that assuming xo and fo are constants would you not get

FoX(X-Xo)
----------
2Xo

Your notation is ambiguous. Is the original force function
F_0\frac{X}{X_0-1}
or
F_0(\frac{X}{X_0}-1)
??
If it is the first, then when X= 3X0, the force is 3F0X0/(X0-1) and when X= 0, it is 0. The area under is the area of a triangle: (1/2)(3X0)(3F0X0/(X0-1)
= 9F0X0/2(X0-1) which is exactly what you would get by integrating.

If it is the second, then when X= 3X0, the Force is 2F0 but when X=0, it is -F0 and the "force graph" has x-intercept at X= X0. Now the "area under the curve" is the area of the triangle with vertices at (X0,0), (3X0,0) and (3X0, 2F0) (which is 2F0X0) minus the area of the triangle with vertices at (X0,0), (0,0) and (0,-F0) which is (1/2)F0X0: work done (2- 1/2)F0X0=(3/2)F0X0. I guess that's the one you meant.

In terms of integration, The work would be the integral, from X= 0 to 3X0, of F0((X/X0- 1) dx. The anti-derivative of that is F0(X2/(2X0)- X). Evaluating that at 3X0 and 0 gives F0((9/2)X0-3X0)= F0(3/2)X0 as before.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top