Bijection proof (intro analysis)

zelmac
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering whether my solution to this problem is correct, since the answer in the answer sheet says that this is provable, and I think I found a counterexample... Any help is appreciated :)

Homework Statement

Prove or disprove: ##f:D->K##, where ##D,K != empty##, is a bijection iff there exists a unique function ##g:K->D## such that:
##f\circ{g}\circ{f}=f##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Lets look at the following function: ##f:\{1\}-->\{1,2\}##, defined by ##f(1)=1##. Clearly the function##g:\{1,2\}-->\{1\}##, defined by ##g(1)=1## and ##g(2)=1## satisfies ##f\circ{g}\circ{f}=f##, since ##f(g(f(1)))=f(g(1))=f(1)##, and 1 is the only element in the domain of f. Let's assume that ##g':\{1,2\}-->\{1\}## is a function that satisfies ##f\circ{g'}\circ{f}=f##. The only way that g' is even a function is if we define it as ##g'(1)=1##and ##g'(2)=1##, so ##g'=g##, so ##g## is a unique function ##K-->D## which satisfies the condition.
But f is not a surjection, so we have found a function ##f:D-->K## which is not a bijection, but for which there exists a unique function ##g:K-->D## such that ##f\circ{g}\circ{f}=f##, so the proposition does not stand.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zelmac said:
I'm wondering whether my solution to this problem is correct, since the answer in the answer sheet says that this is provable, and I think I found a counterexample... Any help is appreciated :)

Homework Statement




Prove or disprove: ##f:D->K##, where ##D,K != empty##, is a bijection iff there exists a unique function ##g:K->D## such that:
##f\circ{g}\circ{f}=f##



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution





Lets look at the following function: ##f:\{1\}-->\{1,2\}##, defined by ##f(1)=1##. Clearly the function##g:\{1,2\}-->\{1\}##, defined by ##g(1)=1## and ##g(2)=1## satisfies ##f\circ{g}\circ{f}=f##, since ##f(g(f(1)))=f(g(1))=f(1)##, and 1 is the only element in the domain of f. Let's assume that ##g':\{1,2\}-->\{1\}## is a function that satisfies ##f\circ{g'}\circ{f}=f##. The only way that g' is even a function is if we define it as ##g'(1)=1##and ##g'(2)=1##, so ##g'=g##, so ##g## is a unique function ##K-->D## which satisfies the condition.
But f is not a surjection, so we have found a function ##f:D-->K## which is not a bijection, but for which there exists a unique function ##g:K-->D## such that ##f\circ{g}\circ{f}=f##, so the proposition does not stand.

Sounds correct to me. There is only one function g:{1,2}->{1}, but f is not a surjection.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top