Binary operations, subsets and closure

icantadd
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1)
Let S be a set and p: SxS->S be a binary operation. If T is a subset of S, then T is closed under p if p: TxT->T. As an example let S = integers and T be even Integers, and p be ordinary addition. Under which operations +,-,*,/ is the set Q closed? Under which operations +,-,*,/ is the set of irrationals closed

Homework Equations



not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


for 1) the irrationals can't be closed under any operations. Q is probably closed under all of them except division. But it is the example and definition that gets me. If T is a subset of the Integers, there is no way it will be closed under addition. Just take the Sup of the set and add 1 or the inf of the set and subtract 1. So I guess my question is: is closure peculiar to the subset we have taken, and if so How can we say that an entire set, like the Integers is closed under some operation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The even integers are a subset of the integers and they are closed under addition, aren't they?
 


icantadd said:

Homework Statement



1)
Let S be a set and p: SxS->S be a binary operation. If T is a subset of S, then T is closed under p if p: TxT->T. As an example let S = integers and T be even Integers, and p be ordinary addition. Under which operations +,-,*,/ is the set Q closed? Under which operations +,-,*,/ is the set of irrationals closed

Homework Equations



not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


for 1) the irrationals can't be closed under any operations. Q is probably closed under all of them except division. But it is the example and definition that gets me. If T is a subset of the Integers, there is no way it will be closed under addition. Just take the Sup of the set and add 1 or the inf of the set and subtract 1. So I guess my question is: is closure peculiar to the subset we have taken, and if so How can we say that an entire set, like the Integers is closed under some operation.
"Closed under an operation", *, means that if a and b are in the set then a*b is also in the set. That has nothing to do with sup or inf. You may be confusing this, algebraic, notion of "closed" with the topological notion of "closed set". They have nothing to do with one another.

If you add two integers the result is again an integer so the set of integers is closed under addition. If you add two even integers together, the result is again an even integer so the set of even integers, as Dick said, is closed under addition. The sum of two odd integers is even so the set of odd integers is not closed under addition.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top