Binding energy of 2p electron in Lithium

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Explain why the 2p state for Lithium is close to the n=2 state for Hydrogen and why the 2s state is much higher. (5.4eV)

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that for 2p state (n=2, l=1) we can model (for some reason) the Lithium valence electron like the electron orbiting Hydrogen. My guess is that we cannot do this for the l=0 state (2s) but I am unsure why this is the case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be that because the electron has angular momentum that it is less influenced by the other electrons in the n=1 state and we can treat the 2 electron 3 proton system as 1 proton?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top