Solving Binding Energy Problem of 147N

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the binding energy of the nitrogen isotope 147N, with a nuclear mass of 13.999234 amu and a standard atomic mass of 14.0067 amu. The mass defect is calculated as 0.007466 amu, which is then converted to kilograms for energy calculation using E = mc². The calculated energy for the mass defect is approximately 1.115784 x 10^-12 J, but the expected value per nucleon is 1.19773 x 10^-12 J/nucleon. The discrepancy arises from the misunderstanding of how to derive the binding energy per nucleon from the total binding energy. Clarification is needed on the proper method to obtain the binding energy per nucleon from the total energy calculated.
archa1c
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Problem: Calculate the binding energy of 147N (nuclear mass of 13.999234 amu) in Joules per nucleon. According to periodic table, the mass of N is 14.0067 amu.

Homework Equations


E = mc2


The Attempt at a Solution



Calculate mass defect:

13.999234 - 14.0067 = 0.007466
Convert to kg:

0.007466 * (1.66053886 * 10-27) = 1.23976 * 10-29

Use mass/energy equivalence (E = mc2) to calculate energy of the mass defect:

E = (1.23976 * 10-29)(3 * 108)2 = 1.115784 * 10-12[/EQ]

The result *should* be the binding energy of the entire molecule (I would have thought per nucleon would be just dividing this by 14) - but the answer my book gives is 1.19773*10-12 J/nucleon.

Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Periodic table doesn't contain mass of a nuclide in question.

--
methods
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top