Biochemical Reaction Catalysing Solar Trap

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadmanMurray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction Solar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around innovative methods to harness solar energy inspired by photosynthesis. The initial idea suggests utilizing antenna pigments, like chlorophyll, to catalyze chemical reactions for fuel production. Recent research highlights the focus on catalysts used by plants, particularly manganese-based catalysts that split water, potentially enabling the production of inexpensive hydrogen for a green hydrogen economy. It's clarified that while light provides energy for reactions, it is not a catalyst; instead, catalysts, often proteins, facilitate reactions that would otherwise occur too slowly. The conversation also touches on existing catalytic processes in fuel production, such as catalytic cracking in oil refining. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of thermodynamic and kinetic favorability for chemical reactions, noting that light energy can make certain reactions feasible. The potential for light-powered reactions in organic chemistry and the role of mitochondria in hydrogen production are also mentioned, raising questions about the classification of this research under biochemistry and biotechnology.
MadmanMurray
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about an alternative way to harness solar energy there after reading a bit about photosynthesis. So these antennae pigments which chlorophyll is composed of trap solar energy and direct it so that it can be used to catalyse chemical reactions if I'm not mistaken. Wouldn't there exist substances that we can use to catalyse chemical reactions necessary for making fuels and other useful substances?

I haven't got any specific reactions in mind since I was just thinking about how it would be possible to setup a large scale biochemical solar trap geared towards catalysing chemical reactions.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
One of my good friends is really big into photosynthesis and "synthetic photosynthesis", so he's been keeping me up to date on the latest breakthroughs. You're pretty close, but a little mixed up (though I'm not an expert either by any means). Most of the latest researching had been focusing on the catalysts plants use to split water, which happens to be based on manganese is I remember right. Many people hope that if this one step of photosynthesis could be isolated and removed from the rest of the system then we might be able to use it to produce cheap hydrogen with which to fuel a new green hydrogen economy.

Getting to the point though, light isn't the catalyst. Light just provides all the energy to make things happen. The catalysts are parts of proteins (I think). If you're intesrets in doing a home experiment to split water the way that plants do I think you can do a simple extraction with spinach leaves and acetone. Google the terms "spinach" and "photosynthesis" and you should be able to find tons of articles on this type of research.

Also, we already use catalysts to produce fuel. When crude oil is refined a process called catalytic cracking is used to increase the percentage yield of gasoline. Currently it employs a zeolite based catalyst which breaks apart the heavier chain hydrocarbons thus increasing the relative amount of lighter products.

I don't feel like I really answered your question, but I hope I've still helped somehow.
 
In order for a chemical reaction to occur, it must meet two criteria: 1) the reaction must be thermodynamically favorable, and 2) the reaction must be kinetically favorable. The conversion of carbon dioxide into glucose is normally a very thermodynamically unfavorable process (the reverse reaction, burning glucose, releases a lot of energy). In photosynthesis, the energy from light gives the reaction enough extra energy so that the reactions are now thermodynamically favorable.

The second criteria is where catalysts come in. Normally, the reactions of photosynthesis occur very slowly. You could take carbon dioxide and water, and shine light on them, but nothing would occur even though all of the ingredients are there. To speed up the reaction and make it occur on a reasonable time scale, nature has evolved enzymes (biological catalysts) to help along the reactions.

As for using light to power reactions, there are a number of reactions that are commonly used in organic chemistry labs that are powered by light. It is very common for light energy to be used to add chlorine or bromine atoms to an organic compound. Unfortunately, the CFCs use similar mechanisms to harvest the energy of light to promote the destruction of ozone in the upper atmosphere.
 
I have a question. does research like this fall under Biochemistry & Biotechnology?

Also I was wondering, since the mitochondria in our cells produce protons which are trapped in the matrix of the organelle, couldn't we use a similar process to produce cheap Hydrogen?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top