Why Do Hubble Photos Have Black Squares?

AI Thread Summary
Hubble photos sometimes feature black squares due to the mosaic imaging process used by the Wide-Field Planetary Camera 2, which consists of four CCD chips. These gaps occur when one chip has a different optics package, leading to a "stairstep" pattern in the final image. Additionally, post-processing issues can result in color oversaturation and blurriness, necessitating the removal of certain light sources. The black squares are not indicative of missing data but rather represent areas where the chips do not align perfectly. Overall, these artifacts are a result of the technical limitations of the imaging system and processing techniques.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Maybe there's a bright foreground object there that would ruin the processing of the data?
 
The majority of the photos you see from the Hubble Space Telescope, like this one, were taken with the "Wide-Field Planetary Camera 2," which is composed of four independent CCD chips laid out in an array. One of the CCDs has a different optics package to increase its resolution, so, when used together to form a mosaic image, a "stairstep" pattern results. If you look closely at this image, you'll see the slightly different color balance from the "PC" CCD versus the other three, larger, "WFC" CCDs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_Field_and_Planetary_Camera_2

- Warren
 
isnt it obvious...

alien saucer! and The MAN is covering it up!

just kidding. :confused:

Hurkyl explained one reason why this could be.

The other might be post-processing problems.

you should be aware that these pictures are slowly layered into colour.

personally with photoshop I've seen quite a few times problems when i tried this. I would layer the colours and the last steps the colours would over saturate and it would then make it very blurry. so to save the colour picture u need to remove the blur, and by that u need to remove the affecting light source.
 
Hurkyl explained one reason why this could be.
I was speculating. chroot posted the answer already.
 
Chroot is correct. The published photos are mosaic images. The missing pixels are merely gaps in the overlay.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top