How do I find the work function of a metal using black body radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the work function of a metal using black body radiation principles. The problem involves calculating the initial and final temperatures of a black body based on its peak emission wavelengths and the increase in total radiation. The user initially struggles with applying Stefan’s law and Wein’s displacement law correctly, leading to discrepancies in their calculations. The correct approach involves using Wein’s law to relate temperature and wavelength, ultimately deriving the energy of incident radiation. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying physical laws to solve problems in thermodynamics and photoemission.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


1)The peak emission from a black body at a certain temperature occurs at a wavelength of 9000 Angstrom. On increasing its temperature the total radiation emitted is increased 81 times. At the initial temperature, when the peak radiation from the black body is incident on a metal surface, it does not cause any photoemission from the surface. After the increase of temperature, the peak radiation from the black body causes photoemission. To bring these photo electrons to rest, a potential equivalent to the excitation energy between n=2 and n=3 Bohr levels of Hydrogen atom is required. Find the work function of the metal.


Homework Equations


According to Wein’s displacement law,
[lambda1(max.) x T1] = 2.898 x 10^(-3) metre-Kelvin

According to Stefan’s law,
Energy of incident radiation(E2) = (sigma) x T^4


The Attempt at a Solution



I have doubt only in the first part of the problem. So I haven’t worked out the entire problem.
I solved it in the following way:

Let T1 and T2 be the initial and final temperatures respectively. Let lambda1(max.) and lambda2(max.) be the initial and final wavelengths respectively. Let E1 and E2 be the initial and final energy of the radiations respectively.
According to Stefan’s law,
E is proportional to T^4
Hence,
E1/E2 = [T1/T2]^4
Therefore,
T2 = 3T1 {since given that E2/E1 = 81}
According to Wein’s displacement law,
[lambda1(max.) x T1] = 2.898 x 10^(-3) metre-Kelvin
Hence, T1 = 3220 Kelvin
Hence, T2 = 3T1 = 9660 Kelvin
According to Stefan’s law,
Energy of incident radiation(E2) = (sigma) x T^4
= 5.67 x 10^(-8) x (9660 x 10^(-10))^4
= 4.94 x 10^(-32) Joules


The solution given in my book is as follows:

According to Stefan’s law,
E is proportional to T^4
Hence,
E1/E2 = [T1/T2]^4
Therefore,
T2 = 3T1 {since given that E2/E1 = 81}
According to Wein’s displacement law,
[lambda(max.) x T] = constant
i.e. [lambda1(max.) x T1] = [lambda2(max.) x T2]
lambda2(max.) = 3000 Angstrom
Energy of incident radiation(E2) = hc/ lambda2(max.) = 6.63 x 10^(-19) Joules

Why do I get 2 different answers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You assumed a lot of things when you use Stefan's Law: that it was a perfect blackbody, and the flux was uniform.

The solution your book gave is correct because it does everything through Wein's Law, and then uses the fact that E=hv=hc/lambda.
 
Thats cool! Thanks.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top