Black Hole Entropy: Is S=A/4 robust ?

Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4
I would like to use the formula S=A/4 to find the entropy of a black hole. But before I go ahead and believe that formula, there are a couple of subtleties that are troubling me.

First of all, in just about every "classical" treatment of black hole thermodynamics, there is usually the underlying assumption that the spacetime is 4-dimensional, and asymptotically flat. Does anyone know if the above formula S=A/4 holds in higher-dimensional spacetimes that aren't asymptotically flat?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
S=A/4 is valid in higher dimensions. I am not sure about asymptotic flatness.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
5K
Back
Top