Black hole evaporation, where does it all go?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes are theorized to evaporate through Hawking radiation, which involves the emission of particles as they lose mass. Smaller black holes evaporate faster due to their higher temperatures, as their surface gravity increases inversely with their size. There is no critical mass that prevents black holes from evaporating, including supermassive ones. White holes, which are theorized opposites of black holes, currently lack observational evidence. The discussion emphasizes the need for a quantum gravity theory to fully understand these processes.
Geordie Ross
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I hear that black holes evaporate, but does it all get converted into Hawkins radiation? And what role do white holes play in evaporation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I hear that black holes evaporate, but does it all get converted into Hawkins radiation?
Hawking.
Probably yes, but a theory of quantum gravity is needed to study that in detail. As the black hole gets hotter and hotter, it begins to emit heavier particles, in addition to the photons.
And what role do white holes play in evaporation?
There are no indications that white holes exist.
 
Thanks, and is it true that the smaller the black hole, the faster it evaporates? And is there a critical mass that prevents super massive black holes from evaporating?
 
Geordie Ross said:
Thanks, and is it true that the smaller the black hole, the faster it evaporates? And is there a critical mass that prevents super massive black holes from evaporating?
Yes, smaller black holes radiate at higher temperatures. The Hawking temperature is directly proportional to the surface gravity, \kappa, of the object, T = \kappa/2\pi. As the black hole shrinks, its surface gravity goes up (proportional to 1/R^2_S, where R_S the Schwarzschild radius) and, hence, so does its temperature.

There is no critical mass that prevents black holes from evaporating.
 
Thank you for the detailed replies, my curiosity is temporarily quenched!
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...

Similar threads

Back
Top