Blackbody Radiation of Boiling Water

stanli121
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about this the other day and I wanted some other input on the matter. Cups of boiling water (I was thinking about coffee) give off gobs of IR radiation at both near and mid wavelengths. Could I think of a coffee mug as an approximate black body for IR radiation? The insulation of the mug seems to make it possible but I'm really unsure.

Second, is there a decent theoretical manner to calculating the expected peak emissions of hot coffee in a coffee mug? I'm getting very curious and I could always use an IR spectrometer but I was wondering if there's any method via QM based on vibrational modes of water at a given temperature to predict the peak emissions? If the cup can be modeled as a blackbody Planck's Radiation Law solves my problems but I have a hunch it won't be that simple.

Lastly, my understanding of this physics is at the advanced undergraduate level so I should be able to understand any math/theory people throw out for this. Thanks a lot in advance mates!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stanli121 said:
I was thinking about this the other day and I wanted some other input on the matter. Cups of boiling water (I was thinking about coffee) give off gobs of IR radiation at both near and mid wavelengths. Could I think of a coffee mug as an approximate black body for IR radiation? The insulation of the mug seems to make it possible but I'm really unsure.

Second, is there a decent theoretical manner to calculating the expected peak emissions of hot coffee in a coffee mug? I'm getting very curious and I could always use an IR spectrometer but I was wondering if there's any method via QM based on vibrational modes of water at a given temperature to predict the peak emissions? If the cup can be modeled as a blackbody Planck's Radiation Law solves my problems but I have a hunch it won't be that simple.

Lastly, my understanding of this physics is at the advanced undergraduate level so I should be able to understand any math/theory people throw out for this. Thanks a lot in advance mates!

I don't understand why you wouldn't expect Wien's Law to give the correct answer?
 
Doesn't the Wien Law rely on the object being a black body? If the coffee could be considered a black body then this would be a relatively simple thing to figure out but that's where I'm stuck -- whether or not this can be accurately modeled as a black body!
 
stanli121 said:
Doesn't the Wien Law rely on the object being a black body? If the coffee could be considered a black body then this would be a relatively simple thing to figure out but that's where I'm stuck -- whether or not this can be accurately modeled as a black body!

Why wouldn't it be a black body? It's going to have additional absorption/emission depending on the chemistry but it'll still have the black body as the dominant emission. If you don't want to worry about additional emissions then do your experiment in a dark box+faraday cage
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top