What Is Earth's Equilibrium Temperature Assuming Blackbody Radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Earth's equilibrium temperature based on the solar constant of 1.36x10^3 W/m^2, assuming Earth behaves as a blackbody. The key equation referenced is the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which relates temperature to energy radiated. A participant realizes the mistake of using the full surface area of Earth instead of the circular cross-section that absorbs solar energy. Correctly calculating the absorbed energy is crucial for determining the equilibrium temperature. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding energy absorption in blackbody radiation calculations.
FreeAnnyong
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The energy reaching Earth from the Sun at the top of the atmosphere is 1.36x10^3 W/m^2, called the solar constant. Assuming that Earth radiates like a blackbody at uniform temperature, what do you conclude is the equilibrium temperature of Earth?


Homework Equations



Stefan-Boltzmann law: R=\sigmaT^4, Wein's displacement law: (\lambdamax)T=2.898x10^-3 mK

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the Earth radiates the same amount of energy it takes in if it is acting as a black body, but I am stuck at figuring out how much energy the Earth is actually absorbing from the sun. If I can figure that out I know what to do with the rest of the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look up the radius of the Earth and assume it absorbs all of the energy that crosses the circular cross section it presents to the sun, wouldn't that do it?
 
Ah, you're right, I was stupidly using the full surface area of the Earth instead of a cross section.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top