Blades/propellers - power optimization - drone hovering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around optimizing drone propellers for battery life during hovering. Participants explore various configurations of blades, including the comparison between two-blade and four-blade designs, and consider factors affecting efficiency and performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant wonders about the optimal blade configuration for maximizing battery life while hovering, specifically considering the trade-offs between two-blade and four-blade propellers.
  • Another participant notes that efficiency can vary significantly due to multiple factors, suggesting that empirical testing of different setups may be necessary to determine the configuration with the least current draw during hovering.
  • A different viewpoint states that generally, two-bladed props are more efficient than four-bladed ones, citing that the tips of the blades are less efficient than the main parts.
  • One participant mentions a specific design approach where the pitch of the blades starts high near the hub and decreases toward the tips, indicating a potential method for optimizing performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the efficiency of two-blade versus four-blade propellers, indicating a lack of consensus on the best configuration for optimizing battery life during hovering.

Contextual Notes

Discussion includes various assumptions about efficiency, performance trade-offs, and the need for empirical testing, which may not be fully explored or resolved.

udib
I wonder what is the best figures for blades/prepellers - assuming I am trying to optimize battery life and my main usage for the drone is hoovering.
I can not play with the arm length.
I do consider 4 blades over 2 blades at the same propeller - not sure if it will help.
Any feedback or idea is appreciated
thanks , udi
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are going to be a lot of variables here... typically slower things are more efficient, but with a lot of exceptions.. motors will have different efficiencies as well.. You may have to empirically test several setups and watch your current draw.. the setup with the least current draw while hovering is going to have the longest battery life.. Downside to bigger, slower blades is it will be less nimble, as well as the bigger, slower blades will require more gearing and be heavier.. It's a balancing act :)
 
In general a 2 bladed prop is more efficient than a 4 bladed prop. That's because the tips of the blades are less efficient then the main part of the blade. Single blade props have been used for some racing model aircraft but they require careful balancing and can cause other problems.
 
Here is one popular, low cost, design. The "high cost" design I've seen is where the pitch starts out high near the hub (sometimes also with increased area) and decreases toward the tips.

upload_2017-10-2_22-38-4.jpeg


upload_2017-10-2_22-37-16.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-10-2_22-32-23.jpeg
    upload_2017-10-2_22-32-23.jpeg
    6.1 KB · Views: 642

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K