Block moving down an inclined plane, spring problem.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the compression of a spring when a block slides down an inclined plane and comes to rest. The initial conditions include a mass of 2.2 kg, a spring constant of 500 N/m, and a kinetic coefficient of friction of 0.11. The participant initially calculated the velocity of the block upon contact with the spring and attempted to use the work-energy principle to find the compression length. However, they faced issues with their energy balance, particularly in accounting for potential energy and the work done by friction, leading to incorrect results. Ultimately, the correct compression of the spring was determined to be 0.2798 m after revising the calculations and properly applying the energy equations.
Dealucis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



problem1.jpg


Find the amount which the spring is compressed after the mass comes to rest. Assume a kinetic coefficient of friction of 0.11 and an initial velocity along the surface of v = 4m/s.

Given values :
mass = 2.2kg
k = 500 N/m
delta = 0.036m
theta = 23 degrees

The attempt at a solution

Alright.. here goes

My approach to this problem is to find the velocity at where the block touches the spring, and make it as the initial velocity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using a free body diagram, I got the following values.

F = mg = 21.56N
N = mg cos theta = (21.56)cos23 = 19.846N
friction force = N.coefficient = (19.846)(0.11) = 2.183N
force down the plane = mg sin theta = (21.56)sin23 = 8.424N

Adding up the force in the x direction (parallel to the slope), F = 8.424 + (-2.183) = 6.241N

since F = ma,
6.241N = (2.2kg)a
therefore, a = 2.837m/s^2 [sorry, I'm not familiar with the forums. the unit is metre per seconds squared]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, with the acceleration, the velocity at when it touches the spring can be calculated :

final velocity squared = initial velocity squared + 2(acceleration)(distance)
v^2 = u^2 + 2(a)(r)
v^2 = 4^2 + 2(2.837)(0.036)
v = squareroot(16 + 0.204)
v = 4.025m/s

therefore, the velocity at when it touches the spring is 4.025m/s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the work-energy equation,

T1 + U = T2

as when the final velocity is when the block comes to rest, the final velocity is 0, therefore

(mv^2)/2 + U = 0
17.821 +U = 0
therefore U = 17.821J
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the value, the compression length can be found:
17.821 = 0.5(k)(final compression length squared - initial compression length squared)
17.821 = 0.5(500)(x^2 - 0)
17.821 = 250(x^2)
0.071283 = x^2
x = squareroot(0.071283)
x = 0.267m

that was my answer, but it's wrong. Much help would be appreciated on where i went wrong and how to solve the problem. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the work-energy equation,

T1 + U = T2

as when the final velocity is when the block comes to rest, the final velocity is 0, therefore

(mv^2)/2 + U = 0
17.821 +U = 0
therefore U = 17.821J

What is T2 and why is it zero? Where are you considering the potential energy of the block in this energy balance?

If I was to go about this problem, I would do it in two steps. First would be to find the velocity of the block at the spring. a = (Fg - Ff)/m

Then I would do an energy balance of the spring and block as a system. KEblock + PEblock = PEspring

Which you would solve for the displacement in the PEspring term.
 
Topher925 said:
What is T2 and why is it zero? Where are you considering the potential energy of the block in this energy balance?

If I was to go about this problem, I would do it in two steps. First would be to find the velocity of the block at the spring. a = (Fg - Ff)/m

Then I would do an energy balance of the spring and block as a system. KEblock + PEblock = PEspring

Which you would solve for the displacement in the PEspring term.

Thanks for the tip, but i don't quite get your formula for acceleration. Can you explain more?

For the potential energy, yeah, i forgot about that. After revising my calculations, i still got the wrong answer.

Kinetic energy of block = 0.5mv^2 -0.5mu^2 (where v = final velocity and u = initial velocity)
therefore kinetic energy = -17.821
potential energy of block = -mg(0.036sin23) = -0.303

potential energy of spring = -0.5kx^2

solving the equation I ended up with 0.269m, which is still wrong :(
 
The solution is 0.2798m.

How is it possible? working backwards I found the acceleration to be around 21m/s^2. Isn't the acceleration suppose to be less than gravity? Can someone help me point out where i went wrong please? (please refer to my calculations above for my steps on finding the acceleration). Much help would be appreciated!
 
Hi Dealucis,

Dealucis said:
Thanks for the tip, but i don't quite get your formula for acceleration. Can you explain more?

For the potential energy, yeah, i forgot about that. After revising my calculations, i still got the wrong answer.

Kinetic energy of block = 0.5mv^2 -0.5mu^2 (where v = final velocity and u = initial velocity)
therefore kinetic energy = -17.821
potential energy of block = -mg(0.036sin23) = -0.303

I don't believe this is correct. You're writing the energy equation for the motion while the spring is being compressed; but the distance 0.036 refers to the part of the motion that came before that. What do you think this term should be?

potential energy of spring = -0.5kx^2

solving the equation I ended up with 0.269m, which is still wrong :(

Dealucis said:
The solution is 0.2798m.

How is it possible? working backwards I found the acceleration to be around 21m/s^2. Isn't the acceleration suppose to be less than gravity? Can someone help me point out where i went wrong please? (please refer to my calculations above for my steps on finding the acceleration). Much help would be appreciated!

I'm not seeing where you are getting the acceleration to be 21m/s^2 if you use that answer. Can you give more details?
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using the work-energy equation,

T1 + U = T2

as when the final velocity is when the block comes to rest, the final velocity is 0, therefore

(mv^2)/2 + U = 0
17.821 +U = 0
therefore U = 17.821J
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are missing the loss of energy in this part.

So, the equation should be U-T1=Wf (where U = potential energy of spring, T1=total initial energy of object, Wf= work done by friction)

U is equal to T2 ( T2 = total final energy of object)
It is because when the spring is compress by object, so the spring will gain the potential energy from the total final energy of object.

0.5*2.2*(4.025^2) + 2.2*9.8*(x*sin(23))=2.185*x + 0.5*500*x^2

From above equation u will get the value of x which is the amount which the spring is compressed.

x= 0.2798m
Here is the answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top