Block sliding down a moving plane whose angle of inclination changes

stripes
Messages
262
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bar of soap of mass m is at rest on a frictionless square plate of side-length D rests on a horizontal table. At t=0 I start to raise one edge of the plate the plate pivots about the opposite edge. The angular velocity about the pivot is a constant ω Show that the equation of motion for the soap is of the form \ddot{x} - \omega ^{2} x = - g sin( \omega t ). Solve this for x(t) given that . In this equation x is the distance from the pivot to the soap (i.e. measured up the slope).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



We will find that the potential energy is V = mgx sin( \theta ), and the kinetic energy is just T = \frac{1}{2} m \ddot{x}^{2}. Then our Lagrangian is just L = \frac{1}{2} m \ddot{x}^{2} - mgx sin( \theta ) and since we know omega is constant, then θ = ωt, so our Lagrangian becomes L = \frac{1}{2} m \ddot{x}^{2} - mgx sin( \omega t).

But using the Euler-Lagrange equation yields \ddot{x} = -g sin( \theta ).

Where did the - \omega ^{2} x come from? i want to say that it has something to do with the fact that the angle is changing over time...but i can't see it right now. any help would be great. thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the kinetic energy from motion perpendicular to the direction of x. As you know the motion of the slope, you can relate this to x and t.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top