Block Sliding Down Circular Ramp (w/ Friction)

AI Thread Summary
A block on a quarter-circle ramp with friction is analyzed to find its velocity at the bottom using force equations in the normal and tangential directions. The equations lead to an acceleration expression that incorporates gravitational and frictional forces. The user attempts to apply a kinematic equation but struggles to rearrange it into a solvable differential equation format. There is a discussion about the assumption that the block remains in contact with the ramp throughout its motion, with suggestions to use the work-energy theorem instead. The focus remains on solving the problem as directed in the text, despite the complexities involved.
Bakeman
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A block of mass m is positioned at the top of a quarter-circle ramp with radius R and friction coefficient μ. To find the velocity v at the bottom, I did the force summation equations in the n- and t-directions and came up with:

n: N - mgsinθ = mv^2/R
t: mgcosθ - μN = ma

I then solve for N in the n-direction equation, then subsitute into the t-direction equation. Solving for a, I get:

a = g(cosθ - μsinθ) - μv^2/R

I realize that I need to use this in the kinematic equation: vdv = ads, or in this case, vdv = aRdθ. Doing this, I get:

vdv = (Rg(cosθ - μsinθ) - μv^2)dθ

This can supposedly be rearranged into an easily solvable differential equation in the form of dy/dx + f(x)y = g(x), but I'm not seeing it. I'm assuming that v = y and θ = x, which would make the equation dv/dθ + f(θ)y = g(θ).

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bakeman
Welcome to PF !

Well i haven't been in touch with physics for i long time so i might be wrong but here's a thought ...

The method you are approaching with is based on assumption that the block will remain stick to the surface of quarter circle during complete motion ... but i don't think that is true ...

It will leave its contact as soon as \frac{m v^2}{R} > mgsin\theta - N
 
The ramp is probably oriented so that the flat point rests on the ground not in the air so the block will stay in contact with it through the whole motion.
I would use the work energy theorem to solve this one; kinetic energy = work done by gravity - work done by friction.
 
I've been going back through some of my old college texts and found this problem that I wanted to try to solve. The problem comes before any discussion of work, kinetic energy or potential energy. The problem itself provides tips that basically tell you how to solve it: write the n and t equations, eliminate N, and substitute into vdv = ads. At that point, you should be able to rearrange into the form dy/dx + f(x)y = g(x). That's where I'm getting stuck. I know I can use the work energy theorem, but I'd like to solve it using the book's direction.
 
Last edited:
I attached a picture of the situation. It is assumed that the block always stays in contact with the ramp
 

Attachments

Bakeman said:
I've been going back through some of my old college texts and found this problem that I wanted to try to solve. The problem comes before any discussion of work, kinetic energy or potential energy. The problem itself provides tips that basically tell you how to solve it: write the n and t equations, eliminate N, and substitute into vdv = ads. At that point, you should be able to rearrange into the form dy/dx + f(x)y = g(x). That's where I'm getting stuck. I know I can use the work energy theorem, but I'd like to solve it using the book's direction.
That doesn't matter ... even if it came before the work energy discussion ... a physics problem can be solved in so many ways ...and i like the idea of JHamm

Bakeman said:
I attached a picture of the situation. It is assumed that the block always stays in contact with the ramp

Oops ... i thought this is the case:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=42144&stc=1&d=1324571374

and "kinetic energy = work done by gravity - work done by friction" will perfectly.

and keep in mind that gravity is conservative and friction is non conservative ...
 

Attachments

I understand, but I would still like to solve it according to the direction given in the problem. I'm not as interested in the answer as I am in the method that is being described in this case.
 
Back
Top