Block striking a horizontal spring

AI Thread Summary
A block weighing 8.07 kg compresses a horizontal spring with a spring constant of 372 N/m by 6.87 cm, while experiencing a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.752. The work done by the spring in bringing the block to rest was initially miscalculated, but the correct approach involves using the change in mechanical energy, accounting for friction. The friction force is calculated using the coefficient of friction and normal force, and its work is found by applying the definition of work with the correct angle. The confusion around signs in calculations is clarified by noting that the angle between the force of friction and displacement is 180 degrees, resulting in a negative work value. Ultimately, the speed of the block upon hitting the spring was determined to be 1.11 m/s after resolving the equations correctly.
TraceBusta
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
A moving 8.07 kg block collides with a horizonal spring whose spring constant is 372 N/m. The block compresses the spring a maximum distance of 6.87 cm from its rest position. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the horizontal surface is 0.752.
(a) How much work is done by the spring in bringing the block to rest?
(b) How much mechanical work is done by the force of friction while the block is being brought to rest by the spring?
c) What was the speed of the block when it hit the spring?

for this problem I don't know whether I should start with (a) or not, because the information from the other parts might be useful. I tried to solve (a) but I get the wrong answer.
This is what I did. 1/2 kx^2=.5(372 N/m)(.0687)^2=0.8779 J. <--That is the wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump...anyone?

I've tried to solve for c) by doing 1/2 kx^2=1/2mv^2 and solve for v=.4664 m/s but that is wrong.
 
While the block is sliding in contact of the spring, it's true the spring will bring it to rest, but there's also friction opposing the block's movement.

Thinking about it... solve it using

\Delta E = W_{f}

Thinking about again... your answer for a looks right to me :confused:, what's the books answer?
 
Last edited:
with deltaE do you mean change from Kinetic energy to potential energy of the spring?
 
By \Delta E i mean change of mechanical energy, this is not a conservative system you cannot apply conservation of mechanical energy.

E - E_{o} = W_{f}

I will try E when the block stops, and there's only potential spring energy, and of course then the block hits the spring, there's only kinetic energy. Are you using an app like Webassign? try putting a - in your answer.
 
for part a i put a - in the answer and it was right..thnks.

i'm still confused as to continue on with parts b) and c)
 
TraceBusta said:
for part a i put a - in the answer and it was right..thnks.

i'm still confused as to continue on with parts b) and c)

Heh, i know the feeling, i hate those apps too :smile:
 
With the equation i gave you, i practically solved the problem for you.

Find the friction force magnitude and use it in the definition of work, you know the radius vector magnitude.
 
i think i could solve b) if i knew the answer to c) because then I could use 1/2kx^2-1/2mv^2=(b)?
 
  • #10
Ok. I did Wf=(mu)mg*.0687m and got 4.0899J which is wrong.
/edit I put a - sign and it was right. edit/
 
  • #11
Let's go back to the definition of Work

dW = \vec{F} \cdot d \vec{r}

so

the result for W will be |\vec{F}||\vec{r}|cos\theta

where \theta is the angle between them

What si the force you want to find its work? Friction force, use the definition for magnitude of friction force

F_{f} = \mu N

You already know the magnitude of the radius vector, and you can know the angle between them.
 
  • #12
TraceBusta said:
Ok. I did Wf=(mu)mg*.0687m and got 4.0899J which is wrong.
/edit I put a - sign and it was right. edit/

Let me explain you the minus sign... the angle between the radius vector and the force vector is 180 degrees and cosine of 180 degrees is -1, now you know why.
 
  • #13
Awesome, thanks for your help. I figured out c) by doing -(a)-(b)=1/2 mv^2 and solved for v=1.11 m/s
 
  • #14
It's was a pleasure to be of assistance, :smile:
 
Back
Top