Blowing up hydrogen and oxygen falls under what?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntiChrist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Oxygen
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on creating a hydrogen-fueled propulsion system and calculating the energy produced from hydrogen and oxygen combustion. The original poster seeks guidance on whether to focus on chemistry or rocket science for their calculations. Participants mention the need to understand enthalpy values to determine energy output from combustion, noting that hydrogen is used in existing propulsion systems like the Space Shuttle. There is also a mention of fuel cells using hydrogen in a non-explosive manner, but the original poster expresses a preference for combustion-based propulsion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding chemical reactions and energy calculations for propulsion systems.
AntiChrist
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A hearty hello to all you admirable brainiacs. As this is my first post here it not coincidentally asks advice. I'm interested in creating a propulsion system fueled by hydrogen. I understand that hydrogen mixed with oxygen is explosive, but I need to calculate the exact amount of energy which can be derived from named explosion. I don't know what field of study besides mathematics contains the answer to my quandary. Is it rocket science that I need to look into? Or is it chemistry? I have a feeling it is both, but I don't know under what heading to look.

A more practical explanation of my question: If I had 1 mol of H2. (Hydrogen gas), how much energy can be produced in combustion? And then from energy how much kinetic energy can be produced on an object weighing x.

If my question is not clear please say so. Thanks in advance,

The Third Anti-Christ.:devil:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AntiChrist said:
A hearty hello to all you admirable brainiacs. As this is my first post here it not coincidentally asks advice. I'm interested in creating a propulsion system fueled by hydrogen. I understand that hydrogen mixed with oxygen is explosive, but I need to calculate the exact amount of energy which can be derived from named explosion. I don't know what field of study besides mathematics contains the answer to my quandary. Is it rocket science that I need to look into? Or is it chemistry? I have a feeling it is both, but I don't know under what heading to look.

A more practical explanation of my question: If I had 1 mol of H2. (Hydrogen gas), how much energy can be produced in combustion? And then from energy how much kinetic energy can be produced on an object weighing x.

If my question is not clear please say so. Thanks in advance,

The Third Anti-Christ.:devil:

I WON'T SUPPORT YOUR TERRORIST WAYS

(or do you homework for you, sly)
 
If you have 1 mol of H2, you need 1/2 mol O2. Look up the enthalpy values of H2, O2, and H2O, and you can calculate how much energy you can theoretically get (I assume here you've dealt with enthalpy).

It's not the best estimate, but it's really simple
 
AntiChrist said:
A hearty hello to all you admirable brainiacs. As this is my first post here it not coincidentally asks advice. I'm interested in creating a propulsion system fueled by hydrogen. I understand that hydrogen mixed with oxygen is explosive, but I need to calculate the exact amount of energy which can be derived from named explosion. I don't know what field of study besides mathematics contains the answer to my quandary. Is it rocket science that I need to look into? Or is it chemistry? I have a feeling it is both, but I don't know under what heading to look.

A more practical explanation of my question: If I had 1 mol of H2. (Hydrogen gas), how much energy can be produced in combustion? And then from energy how much kinetic energy can be produced on an object weighing x.
This is a standard chemistry problem, and yes hydrogen can be explosively combustible, but it is the source of energy in LH2/LOX (liquid) propuslion systems like the Space Shuttle Main Engine, which actually uses a hydrogen rich mixture to increase specific impluse.

There is not need to develop a hydrogen propulsion since it already exists. Fuel cells also use hydrogen oxidation, but in a non-explosive process.
 
I WON'T SUPPORT YOUR TERRORIST WAYS

(or do you homework for you, sly)

Erroneous on both accounts!

(I assume here you've dealt with enthalpy).

Do you mean enthropy? I've never delt with enthalpy, but I'll look into it.
Fuel cells also use hydrogen oxidation, but in a non-explosive process.

True, but it is hard to build a rocket like propulsion system with electricity. (Correct me if I'm wrong). I think I need either the LH2 or the hydrogen combustion. But I must be able to calculate trajectories and distances, which is why I am asking guidance.

Thanks to everyone except Pythagorean,
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top