Bohr Radius and Ground State Energy

davesface
Messages
97
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Given the potential energy V(r)=-\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{r} (where e is the unit charge), use the uncertainty principle \Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar to find the Bohr radius r_B for a hydrogen atom and the ground state energy E_0.

Hint: write down the kinetic energy in terms of r_B using the uncertainty principle.

Homework Equations


-TISE: -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2u}{dr^2}+[V+\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}]u=Eu, where u(r)=r*R(r) and R(r) is the radial component of the separable wave function \Psi.
-Alternatively, {V}_{eff} =V(r)+\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution


The hint is really what throws me off. Finding the ground state energy is done out entirely in the textbook, but there is nothing about the modified uncertainty relation or writing the kinetic energy in terms of the Bohr radius before finding it.

I tried doing that, so T=\frac{p^2}{2m}=\frac{\hbar^2}{2mx^2} if we assume equality in the uncertainty relation. Then I plugged that into an equation for the defined quantity \kappa=\frac{\sqrt{-2mE}}{\hbar}=\frac{i}{x}. Do I just plug in r_B for x now? I just don't see at all how doing that, if it's even correct, is leading closer to finding r_B.

EDIT: As an added note, I tried reverse engineering the solution: r_B=\frac{4\pi \epsilon_0\hbar^2}{m_e e^2}=\frac{-\hbar^2}{m_e r V(r)}, but that didn't make the problem any clearer to me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I'm not sure how you can find the Bohr radius without an additional piece of information. If you use the virial theorem, which says <T> = -<V>/2, you can then solve for a0.
 
Our book only mentions the special cases of the virial theorem for stationary states ,2&lt;T&gt;=&lt;x\frac{dV}{dx}&gt;, and stationary states of the harmonic oscillator, &lt;T&gt;=&lt;V&gt;.

Even if I use your version of it, though, I don't see how that helps.
 
For a potential of the form rn, the virial theorem reduces to what I said.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virial_theorem

In your expression for T after you substituted with the uncertainty principle, set x to the Bohr radius. Similarly, in the potential, set r to the Bohr radius. Then solve for the Bohr radius.
 
Wow, that theorem made it a much easier problem to solve. Thanks very much.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top