Bohr radius for single electron orbits

xiankai
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
for ions with more than one proton ie. He+, Li2+ and Be3+, doesn't the extra charge factor into the equation? because it seems only the elementary charge is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_radius" , hence rendering it independent of amount of positive charge present.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
xiankai said:
for ions with more than one proton ie. He+, Li2+ and Be3+, doesn't the extra charge factor into the equation?

Yes. For ions with a single electron but Z protons, replace e with Ze, where e is the unit charge 1.60 \times 10^{-19} C.

Most textbooks do the derivation with hydrogen in mind, and later make the above correction for heavier, hydrogen-like ions.
 
got it. thanks for the quick reply!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top