I Boltzmann Distribution and microstate probabilities

AI Thread Summary
In a canonical ensemble, the probability of occupying specific microstates is influenced by energy, leading to unequal probabilities for different microstates within the system. This contrasts with the total system plus environment, where all microstates are equally probable. The canonical ensemble is motivated by placing the system in a larger heat bath, allowing energy exchange, which results in a calculation of microstates for both the system and the heat bath. The entropy of the total system can be expressed in terms of the heat bath and the subsystem, with the approximation that most energy resides in the heat bath. Ultimately, the probability of the subsystem having a specific energy is related to the number of states in the composite system, demonstrating the dependence on temperature and energy.
I_laff
Messages
41
Reaction score
2
For a canonical ensemble the probability of occupying a certain microstate varies depending on the energy, however I thought that every microstate has an equal chance of being occupied. So what part of the canonical ensemble have I misunderstood?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you were to consider the system plus the environment, you would find that all microstates of the total are still equally probable. But when you focus on the system only, you finds that some of its microstates are more probable than others.
 
  • Like
Likes I_laff
One common way to motivate the canonical ensemble is to consider the system of interest to be placed into a much larger system, the "heat bath", with which it is allowed to exchange energy. Then if we let ##W(E)## be the number of microstates for the composite system with total energy ##E##, we can calculate it this way:

##W_{total}(E) = \sum_{\varepsilon} W_{hb}(E-\varepsilon) W_{s}(\varepsilon)##

where ##W_{hb}(E-\varepsilon)## is the number of microstates of the heat bath with energy ##E-\varepsilon## and ##W_s(\varepsilon)## is the number of microstates of the system of interest with energy ##\varepsilon##, and where ##W_{total}(E)## is the number of states of the composite system. Letting the entropy ##S## be defined via: ##S = k \ln W##, we have:

##e^{S_{total}/k} = \sum_{\varepsilon} e^{(S_{hb}(E - \varepsilon) + S_{s}(\varepsilon))/k}##

At this point, we assume that since the heat bath is much larger than the system of interest, most of the energy will be found in the heat bath. Then we can make the approximation:

##S_{hb}(E - \varepsilon) \approx S_{hb}(E) - \dfrac{\partial S_{hb}}{\partial E} \varepsilon##

Thermodynamically, ##\dfrac{\partial S_{hb}}{\partial E} \equiv \dfrac{1}{T_{hb}}## where ##T_{hb}## is the temperature of the heat bath. So we can write:

##e^{S_{total}/k} = e^{S_{hb}/k} \sum_{\varepsilon} e^{- \varepsilon/(kT)+ S_{s}(\varepsilon))/k}##

The probability of the small system having energy ##\varepsilon## (given that the total energy is ##E##) is proportional to the number of states of the composite system with total energy ##E## and subsystem energy ##\varepsilon##:

##P(E,\varepsilon) \propto e^{- \varepsilon/(kT)+ S_{s}(\varepsilon))/k} = e^{- (\varepsilon - S_{s} T)/(kT))}##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71 and anorlunda
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top