Book for a first proof-oriented calculus course

AI Thread Summary
Tom Apostol's Calculus Vol. 1 is recommended for its scholarly approach, while Spivak's Calculus is noted for being more engaging, particularly for students new to proofs. Apostol's treatment of calculus topics is thorough, but his Vol. 2 is criticized for covering too much material too quickly, making it less favorable compared to Spivak's more sophisticated approach to multivariable calculus. Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds is considered to be at a higher level than Apostol's Vol. 2, requiring additional background in linear algebra and real analysis. Overall, while both texts have their merits, Spivak is often preferred for its clarity and student-friendly style. The discussion suggests that students may benefit more from Spivak if they are less experienced with proofs.
cesaruelas
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Could anyone give any insight on Tom Apostol's Calculus Vol. 1 and Spivak's Calculus related to a proof-oriented calculus course covering the following topics: Axioms for the real numbers, Riemann integral, limits and continuous functions, derivatives of functions of one variable, fundamental theorem of calculus, Taylor's theorem, and infinite series, power series, and elementary functions? Pros/Cons of both? The course requires Apostol's but I would consider working through Spivak too if his treatment of this topics is better than Apostol's. Any link to a relevant thread is appreciated. Another two questions: Is Apostol's Vol. 2 at the same level of Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds? Is Apostol's coverage of Linear Algebra a sound basis for Lang's Linear Algebra?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
spivak is more fun than apostol, but apostol may be a tiny bit more scholarly. I.e. I liked spivak as a student, but later I liked apostol. if you are a student, i recommend spivak.
 
As for the multivariable books, Spivak is much more condensed and is at a higher level than Apostol. Namely, Spivak does vector calculus with differential forms, while Apostol does not.
 
I liked Apostol volume 1 a lot, and probably more than Spivak. If you have no experience with proofs though, you might like Spivak more. I really didn't like Apostol volume 2 however. He treats too many subjects in too short of a span, and you are probably better off learning linear algebra thoroughly with Lang then with Axler (or some similar progression).

As for vector calc, Spivak (Calculus on Manifolds) is pretty sophisticated, and you should probably do some more linear algebra (more than what's in apostol, that's for sure) and some real analysis before you tackle it. It is at a much higher level than Apostol Volume 2.

Summary: Both Apostol and Spivak are great for calculus (as mathwonk said they differ in tone), but in my opinion, Apostol volume 2 is not that great at anything.
 
A multivariable calculus book that I like that is at a higher level than your run-off-the-mill calculus books is the one by Williamson, Crowell, and Trotter. I believe it's called Calculus of Vector Functions. Get the 3rd edition [ or older ], and not the 4th [ which I believe is renamed as Multivariable Mathematics ]. There are used ones for literally less than 5 bucks on Amazon.
 
Spivak > Apostol

I never liked Apostols book that much
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top