Books for overview of QM and/or QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter laymanB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Qft Qm
AI Thread Summary
For beginners interested in quantum mechanics (QM) and quantum field theory (QFT) without delving deeply into mathematical formalism, several book recommendations emerged. G. Venkataraman's "Quantum Revolution" series, consisting of "The Breakthrough," "QED - The Jewel of Physics," and "What is Reality?" is highlighted for its accessible explanations and historical context. Additionally, "The Odd Quantum" by Sam Treiman is noted for its clear presentation of concepts using minimal algebra and calculus. The "Theoretical Minimum" series by Leonard Susskind is also recommended, offering a concise introduction to quantum mechanics and relativity with a focus on simplicity and minimal math. Overall, these resources aim to provide a foundational understanding of quantum theories while avoiding the complexities of formal mathematical frameworks.
laymanB
Messages
170
Reaction score
24
I am not ready to learn the formalism for QM or QFT (maybe someday).

Does anyone have any book suggestions for a beginner like myself that present the theories in accurate ways without going into all the mathematical formalism? Preferably something that is not tied to one interpretation of the theories so that I don't get confused with the implications of adopting a certain interpretation. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can read G. Venkataraman's book series Quantum Revolution (3 parts). The 3 parts are:

1. The Breakthrough
2. QED - The Jewel of Physics
3. What is Reality?

The three books do not have too much mathematical rigour, and are useful for starting with Quantum. The books explain the basics along with the associated history. I myself started with this book.
 
  • Like
Likes laymanB
How much math are you willing to tolerate? I found The Odd Quantum by Sam Treiman to be an excellent introduction to QM and QFT. He uses some algebra and a touch of calculus, not so much to formally derive equations, but to concisely and clearly express important concepts. You might give it a look.
 
  • Like
Likes laymanB
Well, you are asking for the impossible. It's like asking to tell you something without using any appropriate language. I like the books by Susskind, called the theoretical minimum. There are 3 volumes yet (Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, E&M and Relativity). I only know the latter two, but they are very nice with really the minimum of math making "the things as simple as possible but not simpler". Also don't listen to people who claim math isn't fun. I promise you, in fact it is!
 
  • Like
Likes laymanB and BvU
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top