Bound particle, quantum mechanics, conceptual question

noramire
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Problem as written in text (Eisberg, 2nd): If a particle is not bound in a potential, its total energy is not quantized. Does this mean the potential has no effect on the bahavior of the particle? What effect would you expect it to have?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well the question seems very strange to me, perhaps I am not getting it. But according to me, if a particles is not subject / bound in a potential, then its energy is not quantized. Clearly, however, if a particle has a potential, it affects the particles motion. So I suppose the answer Iḿ thinking of is: yes, it does have an effect on the particle and that effect serves to place boundaries on the motion of said particle. Any suggestions on this problem? I might be looking at this question classically, so my idea might not apply. Anyway, any suggestios or ideas would really help. Thanks in advance guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top