Bra Ket Question: Outer Product Complex Conjugate

  • Thread starter Thread starter malawi_glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bra ket
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,431
Is the complex conjugate to the outer product this? :

( |a> <b| ) * = ( |b> <a| )

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think of it as a matrix that's like saying A_ij*=Aji. Looks like an Hermitian conjugate to me.
 
Last edited:
The cc does not interchange a and b.
 
so

(<a|b>) * = (<b|a>)

but not

( |a> <b| ) * = ( |b> <a| )

?
 
malawi_glenn said:
so

(<a|b>) * = (<b|a>)

but not

( |a> <b| ) * = ( |b> <a| )

?

First, note that <a|b> is a complex number, while |a><b| is a linear operator on a vector space.

The answer to your question depends on what you mean by *. What do you mean by *?

If you mean complex conjugation, then I don't know how to take (in a basis-independent way) the complex conjugate of a linear operator.

If you mean adjoint, then (after changing * to {}^\dagger)

\left&lt; a | b \right&gt;^\dagger = \left&lt; b | a \right&gt;

\left( \left| a \right&gt; \left&lt; b \right| \right)^\dagger = \left| b \right&gt; \left&lt; a \right|.

You should verify this from the definition of adjoint.
 
hmm yeah i must have confused those two things.. thanks for all help =)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top