Medical Brain Recovery After Exhaustive Mental Work: Timeframe & Limits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the recovery time of brain function after prolonged mental exertion, drawing parallels to muscle recovery after physical workouts. It suggests that, like muscles, the brain's return to normal function may depend on the intensity and duration of mental work. The conversation raises questions about the maximum recovery time, speculating whether it could exceed a day. Additionally, it explores whether the decline in brain function after extended mental tasks is solely due to reduced glucose and oxygen levels or if other factors contribute. The variability in recovery speed among individuals is also considered, with inquiries into the physical differences in the body and brain that might influence the restoration of glucose and oxygen.
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
What determines how quickly normal function is returned to the brain after long periods of mentally exhaustive work? Is it similar to the body's other muscles in that the time for it to return to normal is dependent on how much work was done in a particular time period? ie. after doing 5mins of hardcore benchpressing it can take days for your arms to return to normal.
And what would be the maximum time it could take, more than a day?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I have a couple more questions.
Is the decreased brain function that you experience after long periods of mental work entirely due to a lack of glucose and oxygen to the brain or is it also because of something else?
Does the speed at which the body restores oxygen and glucose to the brain vary among different people by much?
If so what physical difference in the body/brain causes these different speeds of glucose and oxygen restoration?
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top