Breaking the Law of Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
When a basketball is dropped, it converts gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy until it hits the ground, where some energy is transformed into thermal energy and sound, preventing it from bouncing back to its original height. This energy transformation does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy, as energy is not lost but rather converted into different forms. The ball's elastic potential energy during the bounce is insufficient to regain the initial height due to energy losses. Factors such as thermal energy and sound energy play a role in this process, highlighting the complexity of energy transformations. Understanding these principles clarifies why the ball does not return to its original height after bouncing.
Skizor1337
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When a basketball is dropped then bounces up it reaches 0 kinetic energy, but it doesn't reach original height it was dropped from. Why does this not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skizor1337 said:
When a basketball is dropped then bounces up it reaches 0 kinetic energy, but it doesn't reach original height it was dropped from. Why does this not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy?

What are your thoughts? We need you to attempt to answer the question before we can offer tutorial help (them's the Rules -- see the link at the top of the page).

It's a fun problem -- that do you think is going on?
 
I think its because when the ball bounces back up since it has elastic potential energy. But it doesn't reach the same height it was dropped from because it loses kinetic energy and also gravitational potential.
 
Skizor1337 said:
I think its because when the ball bounces back up since it has elastic potential energy. But it doesn't reach the same height it was dropped from because it loses kinetic energy and also gravitational potential.

Um, no. What different forms of energy are involved in the ball drop and bounce. Think of other forms beyond simple PE and KE...
 
the only other i can think of is thermal but that's on a very small scale. And its not rotational even though it is a ball. I'm kinda stuck on this question
 
Skizor1337 said:
the only other i can think of is thermal but that's on a very small scale. And its not rotational even though it is a ball. I'm kinda stuck on this question

Yes there is some thermal energy change involved? What all heats up from the motion and bouncing? What else would be different if you were bouncing the ball in a vacuum?
 
Im only in Physics not AP. i haven't gotten into depth about things like that. were only in basic. But the teacher said thermal was not a huge factor
 
Do you hear when the ball hits the ground? :)

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top