Breaking up the semi-circle into infinitesimally small rings

  • Thread starter Thread starter spencerw105
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on breaking a semi-circle into infinitesimally small rings to calculate the moment of inertia. The user derived the mass element dm as pi*r*dr and integrated to find the moment of inertia, resulting in .25*pi*R^4, which differs from the expected .5*pi*R^4 for a full disk. A key point raised is the omission of a constant factor for density in the calculations. Including this factor and expressing it in terms of mass and area is crucial for accurate results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for density in such integrative problems.
spencerw105
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1400192241.980915.jpg


I attempted to solve this problem by breaking up the semi-circle into infinitesimally small rings of mass dm and width dr a distance r away from the center [0<r<R]. I then wrote dm in terms of the area: dm=pi*r*dr. Then, I plugged into the formula di=integral(dm*r^2) and integrated from 0 to R giving me .25*pi*R^4. This is not what I would have gotten for a complete disk though I would have gotten .5*pi*R^4 using the same process. Can someone please help I don't even know if I started correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
spencerw105 said:
I plugged into the formula di=integral(dm*r^2) and integrated from 0 to R giving me .25*pi*R^4. This is not what I would have gotten for a complete disk though I would have gotten .5*pi*R^4 using the same process. Can someone please help I don't even know if I started correctly.
You have left out a constant factor for density. What happens when you include that and express it in terms of the mass and area of the object?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top