Brewster angle and reflected light

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of light polarized at 45° to the plane of incidence when it strikes a smooth dielectric surface at the Brewster angle. Participants explore the polarization state of the reflected beam and the implications of Brewster's angle on both polarized and unpolarized light.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the nature of light polarized at 45° and its interaction with the Brewster angle, questioning whether reflection occurs and how the polarization state changes. They discuss the decomposition of polarized light into components and the resulting polarization of the reflected light.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on the effects of Brewster's angle on polarized light. Some guidance has been provided regarding the polarization of reflected light, but there remains some uncertainty about the implications of the angle and the nature of the polarization transformation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the treatment of already polarized light at the Brewster angle and its comparison to unpolarized light, indicating a need for further exploration of these concepts.

notnewton96
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light polarised at 45° to the plane of incidence is incident on a smooth dielectric surface at
the Brewster angle. State the polarisation of the reflected beam (relative to the plane of
incidence).

Homework Equations



Brewster Angle -
tan θ = n2/n1

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply don't understand the question. If the light is polarized and incident at the Brewster angle shouldn't there be no reflection as in brewster windows? I can't actually seem to find much material that covers already polarized light and the brewster angle. Is the effect on the light the same as un-polarized light? So does it simply become horizontally polarized and therefore 45° + 90°?

Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light that is polarized at 45o to the plane of incidence can be treated as a superposition of two components, with one component polarized in the plane of incidence and the other component polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence. What happens to each of those components?

notNewton96 said:
Is the effect on the light the same as un-polarized light? So does it simply become horizontally polarized and therefore 45° + 90°?

That is essentially right, if by horizontally polarized you mean polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence. But I don't understand the 45° + 90°.
 
I thought that it would become polarized perpendicular to its incidence polarization. So what you're saying is that the reflected light is simply polarized 90° relative to the plane of incidence?
 
notNewton96 said:
So what you're saying is that the reflected light is simply polarized 90° relative to the plane of incidence?

Yes, that's right. It doesn't matter whether or not the incident light is polarized or unpolarized. If the angle of incidence is Brewster's angle, then any reflected light will be polarized perpendicularly to the plane of incidence. If the incident light happens to be polarized in the plane of incidence, then no light will be reflected.
 
Ahh ok. That makes sense. Thank you very much for the help :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K