Brewster angle and reflected light

AI Thread Summary
When light polarized at 45° to the plane of incidence strikes a smooth dielectric surface at the Brewster angle, the reflected beam is polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence. The discussion clarifies that regardless of whether the incident light is polarized or unpolarized, reflected light at Brewster's angle will always be polarized perpendicularly. If the incident light is polarized in the plane of incidence, no reflection occurs. The confusion around the 45° + 90° concept is addressed, confirming that reflected light is indeed polarized 90° relative to the plane of incidence. Understanding these principles is essential for applying Brewster's angle in optics.
notnewton96
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light polarised at 45° to the plane of incidence is incident on a smooth dielectric surface at
the Brewster angle. State the polarisation of the reflected beam (relative to the plane of
incidence).

Homework Equations



Brewster Angle -
tan θ = n2/n1

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply don't understand the question. If the light is polarized and incident at the Brewster angle shouldn't there be no reflection as in brewster windows? I can't actually seem to find much material that covers already polarized light and the brewster angle. Is the effect on the light the same as un-polarized light? So does it simply become horizontally polarized and therefore 45° + 90°?

Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Light that is polarized at 45o to the plane of incidence can be treated as a superposition of two components, with one component polarized in the plane of incidence and the other component polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence. What happens to each of those components?

notNewton96 said:
Is the effect on the light the same as un-polarized light? So does it simply become horizontally polarized and therefore 45° + 90°?

That is essentially right, if by horizontally polarized you mean polarized perpendicular to the plane of incidence. But I don't understand the 45° + 90°.
 
I thought that it would become polarized perpendicular to its incidence polarization. So what you're saying is that the reflected light is simply polarized 90° relative to the plane of incidence?
 
notNewton96 said:
So what you're saying is that the reflected light is simply polarized 90° relative to the plane of incidence?

Yes, that's right. It doesn't matter whether or not the incident light is polarized or unpolarized. If the angle of incidence is Brewster's angle, then any reflected light will be polarized perpendicularly to the plane of incidence. If the incident light happens to be polarized in the plane of incidence, then no light will be reflected.
 
Ahh ok. That makes sense. Thank you very much for the help :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top