British scientists is convinced it has found proof of alien life

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yosty22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alien Life Proof
AI Thread Summary
A recent article claims that British scientists have found proof of alien life by retrieving biological organisms from the stratosphere. However, the findings are published in the Journal of Cosmology, which lacks recognition from established scientific databases and has faced criticism for its credibility and peer review standards. Critics argue that the journal promotes fringe theories and that the research lacks substantial evidence. Skeptical voices highlight that high-altitude bacteria have been documented previously, undermining the claim that these organisms must originate from space. The discussion emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific standards, especially in light of budget cuts affecting university research quality. Overall, the claims made in the article are viewed as unsubstantiated and lacking scientific rigor.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4
I stumbled upon this article and was wondering what others think of it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...o-have-found-proof-of-alien-life-8826690.html

A team of British scientists is convinced it has found proof of alien life, after it harvested strange particles from the edge of space.

The scientists sent a balloon 27km into the stratosphere, which came back carrying small biological organisms which they believe can only have originated from space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The "Journal of Cosmology" is not a recognized journal by Thompson Reuters Master Journal list, so it is not accepted by PF. This is where they posted their unsubstantiated claims.

As the article you posted even states
the Journal of Cosmology has had its reputation called into question more than once by other members of the scientific community.

More on it's crackpottery

Reliability

The quality of peer review at the journal has been questioned.[2][3][4][5][6][7] The journal has also been accused of promoting fringe viewpoints and speculative viewpoints on astrobiology, astrophysics, and quantum physics. Skeptical blogger and biologist PZ Myers said of the journal "... it isn't a real science journal at all, but is the... website of a small group... obsessed with the idea of Hoyle and Wickramasinghe that life originated in outer space and simply rained down on Earth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Cosmology#Reliability

I think we can dismiss the findings claimed in the article for now.
 
This is nonsense, the university of Sheffield should take a strong look at its departments. At a time when universities across the country are struggling with budget cuts poor quality research like this published in a non-peer reviewed journal (the journal of cosmology is a crackpot, non credible website) is unacceptable.

Their ideas are riddled with errors but the biggest one is that high altitude organisms must come from space. We have known about high altitude bacteria for a long time, here's a far more reputable reputable article on the subject
http://www.nature.com/news/high-flying-bacteria-spark-interest-in-possible-climate-effects-1.12310
 
My favorite part is that they say there is no known mechanism by which these organisms could have achieved that height from earth, so they must have blasted off from another planet
 
The part about comets being aquatic environments was the icing on the cake for me.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...

Similar threads

Back
Top