Buckling load equation for buckling struts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nexus305
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buckling Load
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the buckling load for a wing strut in a plane, specifically comparing scenarios where the strut is pin-jointed at both ends versus when it is restrained at the center. The focus is on the application of Euler's buckling equations and the implications of boundary conditions on the buckling load.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant applied Euler's equation for buckling to find the load for a pin-jointed strut and received a correct answer but sought clarification on a modified scenario.
  • Another participant suggested considering the shape of the strut when buckled with a center restraint, hinting at a similarity to two struts joined end to end.
  • A different participant questioned the use of a factor of 4 in the modified buckling load equation, proposing that it should be 2 instead, due to the presence of two deflections in the buckled shape.
  • One participant proposed that the effective length of the column is halved when restrained at the center, leading to the squared term resulting in the factor of 4 in the equation.
  • Another participant confirmed the reasoning regarding the effective length and provided a mathematical breakdown to support the factor of 4 in the numerator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct factor to use in the buckling load equation when the strut is restrained at the center, with some supporting the factor of 4 and others questioning it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact reasoning behind the factor used in the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference Euler's buckling equations and the implications of boundary conditions, but there is no consensus on the interpretation of the effective length and its impact on the buckling load calculation.

Nexus305
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I was trying to solve a question where they told me to find the buckling load of a wing strut in a plane that experiences a compressive load along its axis. The strut can be considered to be a pin-jointed at both ends. Dimensions of the strut is as follows: outside diameter is 150 mm and bore is 100 mm and length of 5 m.

For finding the buckling load i used Euler's equation for struts P = (Pi^2*EI)/L^2 and I got the correct answer but i don't understand what exactly I have to do in the second part of the question. Here it is:
(b) Find the buckling load if the wing is re-designed so that the strut is prevented from moving laterally in all planes at its centre.

For this my lecturer had used this equation P = (4*Pi^2*EI)/L^2
So basically 4 times the previous equation. I want to know how he got that equation and when should I use it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what shape the strut would be when it buckled, if the mid point was restrained.

(Hint: it is similar to two struts joined end to end).
 
In that case isn't it supposed to be P=(2*Pi^2*EI)/L^2, instead of P=(4*Pi^2*EI)/L^2

Because if the beam is like 2 struts joined end to end, there will be 2 deflections. The top half and the bottom half would deflect right? How does the equation have a 4 in it?
 
I think it is because the effective length of the column is cut in half. By doing this and squaring it, it is like multiplying the equation by 4. You still need to use the actual length of the column in that equation. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
 
thanks a lot guys!..makes sense now
 
The original length of the strut is: L
When it is secured at the center, each segment becomes: L/2
(L/2)^2 = L/4
which gives you your 4 in the numerator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K