Wow, the OP hasn't been back but what does that matter? This is the OP's statement:
Stephan said:
I'm trying to plan out a project for building a diesel powered car
Then these statements were added:
Baluncore said:
The mass of the tanks, control gear and pneumatic starter will be greater than the electric starter motor and battery you are throwing out.
Averagesupernova said:
As far as tying into the ECU I cannot imagine the need to do so. The OP may not even intend to use a diesel engine that requires an ECU or even a battery for that matter.
It may have been wrong of me to think the OP meant car when he said car and for me that suggests a planned use. Had the OP said "experimental vehicle," I probably would not have wrote what I did. He did say car though and implicit with car comes laws and licensing.
I can't say every state has a statute like this one from Wisconsin but most have minimum requirements at least that state something along the lines of, "For a vehicle to be awarded a VIN, titled and licensed it must at least meet the minimum design standards as set for by the SAE for the year previous to the year of application."
Updated 2015−16 Wis. Stats. Published and certified under s. 35.18, Chapter 347
(1) The headlamp shall be an electric headlamp and the current shall be supplied by a wet battery and electric generator, by a current generating coil incorporated into the magneto or by a generator driven directly by the motor by means of gears, friction wheel, chain or belt.
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/347.pdf
A battery is required. It's a safety and margin of safety requirement which for a battery is one in the same.
Averagesupernova said:
If the charging system wasn't working or even non-existent it simply wasn't an issue unless the engine was stopped and there was not enough left in the battery to restart.
I'm not really sure of what to think of this except when is anything ever needed until it is? I can agree with you if that was your point? Even with disregarding the battery has already been hypothetically thrown out.
About the ECU, I admit I haven't had a reason to stay up on governing requirements but as of Jan 1, 2015, they were to be required in all road vehicles sold in the US and additionally more vehicles such as farm tractors and all the job specific vehicles seen at an airport. I think the regulation was passed in 2012 or 13, and at that time something like 97% of all vehicles sold in the US already had self monitoring and feedback devices so the regulation wasn't about getting black boxes into vehicles. The regulation is about not legally taking them out. The regulation was generically referred to as MAP-21. MAP-21 is name the NHTSA had given to the Event Data Recorder (EDR) standardized protocols it was developing.
Maybe I shouldn't have taken the OP literally? I admit I've made that mistake before.