Pressure, diameter and flow in a pneumatic system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of changing the internal diameter of hoses and fittings in a pneumatic system, specifically focusing on a portable compressor setup. Participants explore how these changes might affect airflow and the performance of pneumatic tools, particularly in relation to peak torque output from an impact wrench.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine the potential increase in airflow by switching from a 1/4" ID hose to a 3/8" ID hose in a compressed air system.
  • Another participant suggests that calculating pressure drop versus flow requires knowledge of the friction factor for the hose, which is not provided.
  • Some participants recommend consulting manufacturer charts or tables for guidance on hose diameter versus length, noting that a 20-meter hose may be too long for optimal performance.
  • One participant proposes measuring the pressure drop across the current setup to assess the need for upgrading to a larger diameter hose.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the clarity of the original question and the ability to calculate the desired outcomes with the given information.
  • Some participants agree that larger diameter hoses generally allow for better airflow, though the exact benefits remain uncertain.
  • One participant mentions cutting the existing hose in half to reduce pressure drop when necessary, indicating a practical approach to managing airflow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions, with some agreeing on the general principle that larger diameter hoses may improve airflow, while others highlight the need for specific calculations and manufacturer guidance. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the exact benefits or calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the absence of specific friction factors, pressure drop calculations, and the impact of hose length on performance. Participants also note the dependence on manufacturer specifications and recommendations.

Simple_One
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have a problem (which is likely to be fairly simple), which I need a hand to resolve. I'm trying to determine the impact of changing the internal diameter of the hose/fitting system in a compressed air system (in this case a portable compressor, with an inbuilt air receiver).

The starting information is as follows...
Compressed air tank outlet diameter: 3/8" ID (9.525mm)
Compressed air tank pressure: 160 psi (1,103.16 kPa)
Compressed air tank size: 1.94231 cubic feet (55L)
Piping and fitting size: 1/4" ID (6.35mm)
Hose length: 20m

The system is fitted with a 1/4" ID pressure regulator, straight after the outlet from the air reciever, and this regulator is set to 90 PSI.

The question is, since the receiver has a 3/8 outlet but is being constricted by the air hose and fittings 1/4 ID, how much extra air flow could I expect to gain by moving to a 3/8 ID hose and fitting system?

Somewhat more specifically, I'm looking at this from the point of the peak torque output from an impact wrench. I'm not certain what factors influence the torque output of these tools, but most of them list a peak air requirement (in L/min or cubic feet per minute) which I assume would correlate with the published peak torque (up to the devices engineered safety limits etc). Most have a maximum operating pressure of 90 PSI, hence the regulator setting.

All other things being equal (and assuming i don't exceed any engineered limits on the pneumatic tool), I would anticipate better performance from the tool if the air hose and fitting system all the way from the receiver outlet was of a larger ID (3/8 vs 1/4), the real question is, how much better...?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
So, should I take it from the lack of response that it's not possible to calculate what I'm seeking with the information provided, or that it is unclear what I'm asking?
 
To calculate the pressure drop vs flow you need the friction factor for the hose. This is something I don't know. Have you looked at the compressor / hose / tool manufacturer's websites? They should have charts or tables or at least "thumb rules" for system design. These might be in the form of recommended hose diameter vs hose length. I think a 20 meter hose is on the long side, if you really need hose that long it would be better to use a larger diameter. Another option is to use hard pipe for most of the length, and put the regulator and hose connection closer to the work. This allows higher pressure closer to the work and shorter hose.
 
Hi, thanks for the advice. Unfortunately this system is a portable one so fixed tubing isn't an option, otherwise I would be doing it :)

I'm going to get a small pressure gauge that I can fit inline at the end of the current system so I can measure pressure drop across the current setup. If it seems to be a significant drop, then I'll just suck up the cost and upgrade the whole show to 3/8" or maybe even 1/2" all the way through. Then I know that the air delivery system is as good as it can be (within practical limits for portability etc) and if more air is needed, I can just swap the whole show on to a larger compressor.

I'll do a rudimentary calculation based on this data as well:
http://www.airtx.com/recommended-air-hoses.htm

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I just googled
Air tool hose size
Got lots of hits. I'd say some of the advise is good and some is misguided. But if you read thru you can make up your own mind. Me, I'd get some 3/8 hose. You don't necessarily have to change all the fittings since a lot of the losses are in the hose.
 
Similar question, no real answers, more focused on the air tool than the flow/pressure, despite what the OP asked. I'm going to stick with the obvious theory that larger diameter equals more goodness. How much extra goodness I still haven't determined; but definitely extra goodness.

I'll also cut the existing 20m hose in half and add another quick connect, at least that way I'm only incurring the extra pressure drop when it's necessary with that hose.

This link has some handy tables relating to hose diameters, flow and pressure drop:
http://www.airtx.com/recommended-air-hoses.htm

Looks like 1/2 ID would always work fine for my purposes. I'll save some pennies and then go for that in the longer run.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K