Building a Submarine-Like Structure: Materials & Thickness for a Given Volume

AI Thread Summary
For a submarine-like structure to maintain a constant volume under pressure, it's crucial to select appropriate materials and determine their thickness. No material can inherently maintain a constant volume under pressure without deformation, so an active structural integrity system may be necessary. The discussion highlights the importance of calculating wall thickness based on the expected pressure, with examples given for steel structures under 5 to 6 atmospheres. Understanding the limits of materials and allowable deformation is essential for design. Accurate formulas and calculations are needed to ensure safety and functionality in high-pressure environments.
6MDM
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I´m trying to find approx. numbers or formulas for a submarine like structure to mantain a constant volume. For a given volume, which materials and to what thickness should the container be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No material can [passively] maintain a constant volume under pressure. You'll have to either design an active structural integrity system or decide how much deformation is allowable.
 


Even when talking about 3-6atm´s? Understandable that everything has it´s limits. I´m looking at for example: a steal structure and trying to find a formula to estimate the wall thickness, considering there would be let´s say 6 atm´s of pressure or let´s say five to make the math easier. Thanks for your reply! Oh, and the gas inside would be air at 1atm.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top