Building an ice rink - question about water pressure exerted on a wall

AI Thread Summary
Building an ice rink on a sloped yard presents challenges due to the significant water pressure on the downhill wall, which can reach 30 inches high. The proposed solution involves adding a ramp of filler against the wall to reduce pressure and create a bowl shape, potentially lessening the force exerted on the wall. However, the discussion highlights that the pressure is not only vertical but also has a horizontal component due to the incline, complicating the effectiveness of the filler. To manage this, a combination of internal filler and external bracing is suggested to support the wall against both pressure components. Ultimately, digging down on the high side could be a viable alternative to reduce water usage and pressure.
schiavonir
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi physics folks-

Every year for the past 3 years, I have built an ice rink in my back yard. Unfortunately, I do not have the flattest back yard, in fact it has quite a downward slope and then a steep uphill slope. But, I'm determined the make the biggest rink I can reasonably make, given what I have to work with.

So, the challenge I end up with is that the side that is furthest downhill ends up being about 30" high, with the pressure of several thousand gallons of water pushing on that wall. It is a struggle, all winter long (and one I sometimes lose) to keep that wall up. I have tried building various bracing structures, and this year I've pounded 2x4 stakes into the ground at 6 different points along that side, and I'm going to build 45 degree supports in addition. I have one more idea, and this idea is what brings me here.

My thought is to add a "ramp" of filler up against that wall in such a way that I create something of a bowl instead of a vertical dam. This would have the benefit of a) using less water, which therefore means less water will be exerting pressure on the wall, and b) exerting pressure downward on the filler material instead of on the wall. Here is an attempt to diagram it.

This diagram represents previous years:

G = ground
W = wall
* = water
X = filler

_________W
*********W
*********W
*********W
*********W
*********W
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG


This diagram represents my idea to add filler:


_________W
*********W
********XW
******XXXW
*****XXXXW
***XXXXXXW
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGG


So will adding filler up against the wall help to reduce the force exerted on the wall by the water?

Thanks in advance for your help. I am an engineer myself, but in Computer Science, and it's been a long time since I've taken those physics classes where I would be able to calculate something like this myself. Let me know if anything in my explanation is unclear.

-Roger
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a humble physics student here, but perhaps I can help get the discussion started. In the simple case of a completely level rink, the pressure per unit area on your wall is simply P = \rho g y, where rho is the density of water, g is the gravitational acceleration, and y is the depth of the rink. In that case, your solution would be very effective, because you're adding strength to the wall proportionally to the increase in pressure.

The problem I see is that when the rink is titled at an angle, you're now dealing with a two-dimensional problem. There is going to be the pressure component caused by the water in the y direction (vertically), but there is also going to be an x component (horizontally) proportional to the severity of the incline and the length of the rink in that direction. Then, referenced to the lower end of the rink, the pressure equation would become something like \rho g(ycos(\theta) + x sin(\theta)) where theta is the angle of the incline with respect to the horizontal. In that case the horizontal component is exerting all its pressure evenly across the wall, so I don't believe the ramp of filler will help for that component. Basically the wall will have to be thick enough from top to bottom to support that component of the force.

If the slope is totally unavoidable, my intuition would be to use the ramp of filler on the inside to handle the first part of the force, and then brace the upper part of the wall from the outside, where it is weakest with respect to the second component of the force.
 
I maybe I’m missing something but it sounds to me digging down 30 inches on the high side of the hill might be the answer. It would use a lot less water and you would not have the support problem. I don’t know you’re exact situation and this may not be possible.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
19K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Back
Top