Bullet fired at a block of wood

AI Thread Summary
A 19-g bullet is shot into a 5-kg block, causing the block to lift 5 mm. The impulse on the block due to the bullet's capture is calculated using the change in momentum, not energy conservation, as the bullet causes permanent deformation. The initial attempts at the solution incorrectly applied energy conservation principles and did not consider the time factor, which is deemed irrelevant for the impulse calculation. The correct approach focuses on the momentum change of the block after the bullet penetrates. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply conservation of momentum for accurate results.
Motorboar
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



An 19-g bullet is shot vertically into an 5-kg block. The block lifts upward 5 mm. The bullet penetrates the block in a time interval of 0.001 s. Assume the force on the bullet is constant during penetration. The impulse on the block due to capture of the bullet is closest to:

Homework Equations


Impulse = P_2 - P_1


The Attempt at a Solution


1/2(mbullet + mblock)v2^2 = (mbullet + mblock)gy
v2 = sqrt(2gy)
v1 = ((mbullet + mblock)/mbullet)*v2
Impulse = m2v2 - m1v1

Comes out wrong, and didn't use the time given. I modeled my solution after a ballistic pendulum problem. Any pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try to do it using conservation of momentum, instead of conservation of energy. total mechanical energy is not conserved here, as the block got permanent deformations by the bullet.
 
Motorboar said:

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2(mbullet + mblock)v2^2 = (mbullet + mblock)gy
v2 = sqrt(2gy)
This is good. Note that you are asked to find the impulse on the block, so what is the change in momentum of the block?

The time is irrelevant for this question. (But I suspect there are other parts to this problem.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top