Bullet trajectories and Newton's Principia

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Principia illustrates that a cannonball's trajectory can vary significantly based on its launch speed, potentially leading to circular or escape trajectories. In contrast, a bullet typically follows a parabolic path due to its lower speed and is often fired at an upward angle. The force of gravity affects both projectiles similarly, but air resistance plays a more significant role at lower altitudes for bullets. The discussion highlights that while both projectiles are influenced by gravity, their initial velocities and angles create distinct trajectory shapes. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the kinematic principles involved.
ja!mee
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Newton's Principia suggested that if you fire a cannon from a high mountain it could fall, circle the earth, or fly away depending on how hard it was fired. Describe how this compares to bullet trajectories. What is the major difference with this trajectory? (for visualizing, see: http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/more_stuff/Applets/newt/newtmtn.html )

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, with this problem I get that if you fire a cannon it could react this way , due to the fact the cannonball would a) succumb to gravity b) get caught betweens Earth's gravity field and begin to orbit or, C) would fly off into space in accordance to Newtons law of motion.

What I don't get is how this compares to bullet trajectory. As far as I understand this would be the same case for a bullet trajectory, with the only difference being F=ma. (please correct me if I am wrong here)

but as this is a kinematics section of a course, it seems that the force answer was not the correct one. Can anyone explain the similarities and differences in terms of kinematics, not force or circular motion (if possible) as I am struggling to grasp this in kinematic terms.

thanks in advance,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of gravity should have the same effect on the bullet as on the cannonball.

According to the picture, the cannon is always fired horizontally.
A bullet fired near the surface of the Earth usually is angled upward, even when aimed at a target at the same height. Could that be the "major difference"? Another factor is air resistance, much less up at mountain height.
 
hmm yes I think that may be part of it. I still just don't feel totally satisfied with that answer. I just feel as though something is missing. maybe I am just trying to complicate the matter.
 
Me, too. Another thing; the bullet from a gun is of lower speed than something that can go into an orbit, so its trajectory will be a parabola in contrast to the circle or ellipse of the orbiting cannonball.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top