Burning a Water Balloon: Exploring Heat Capacity, Conductivity, and Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunanda Goh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon Water
AI Thread Summary
Water balloons do not pop when burned due to their high heat capacity and thermal conductivity, which allow them to absorb and dissipate heat effectively. The density of water plays a crucial role, as it influences both specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity. Higher density means that water molecules can transfer heat more rapidly. Therefore, the relationship between heat capacity, conductivity, and density is integral to understanding this phenomenon. This interplay explains why water balloons can withstand heat without bursting.
Sunanda Goh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I want to ask :
The reason for water balloons to not pop while you're burning it is because of both Heat Capacity and Conductivity right ? But is it related to the density also ? Coz if the density is high, the molecules of the water will transfer the heat quicker.
Hope i can get my answer :) Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both specific heat capacity and conductivity depend on density. So you already took it into account.
 
  • Like
Likes Sunanda Goh
nasu said:
Both specific heat capacity and conductivity depend on density. So you already took it into account.
Thanks for your reply !
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top