Burning a Water Balloon: Exploring Heat Capacity, Conductivity, and Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunanda Goh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon Water
AI Thread Summary
Water balloons do not pop when burned due to their high heat capacity and thermal conductivity, which allow them to absorb and dissipate heat effectively. The density of water plays a crucial role, as it influences both specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity. Higher density means that water molecules can transfer heat more rapidly. Therefore, the relationship between heat capacity, conductivity, and density is integral to understanding this phenomenon. This interplay explains why water balloons can withstand heat without bursting.
Sunanda Goh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I want to ask :
The reason for water balloons to not pop while you're burning it is because of both Heat Capacity and Conductivity right ? But is it related to the density also ? Coz if the density is high, the molecules of the water will transfer the heat quicker.
Hope i can get my answer :) Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both specific heat capacity and conductivity depend on density. So you already took it into account.
 
  • Like
Likes Sunanda Goh
nasu said:
Both specific heat capacity and conductivity depend on density. So you already took it into account.
Thanks for your reply !
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Heating substances in paper cups?
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Ideal working gas for a Stirling engine
Replies
1
Views
3K
Motional EMF for loops of wire vs conducting plates
Replies
9
Views
2K
Does Copper Conduct Heat Better than cPVC?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I try to solve a thermodynamics problem on heat transfer
Replies
3
Views
2K
How does evaporation generate cooling? Swamp coolers edition
Replies
32
Views
3K
Modeling a kongming lantern (sky lantern)
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How to understand experiment to measure heat capacity of solid?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Problem Set Involving Inertia and Balloons
Replies
2
Views
2K
Does Throwing an Object Overboard Affect Pond Water Level?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top