Caculation of line current on a 3 phases unbalanced delta

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating line currents in a three-phase unbalanced delta system with a specified load configuration. Participants explore different methods and formulas for determining the currents in the three lines of the network, considering both complex number calculations and trigonometric approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks the formula for calculating line currents in a three-phase system with specific load conditions.
  • Another participant proposes using complex numbers to calculate the currents, applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to derive relationships between the currents.
  • A different participant agrees with the previous calculations but clarifies the voltage definitions and provides a detailed breakdown of the current calculations using both complex numbers and trigonometric methods.
  • One participant presents an alternative method for calculating line currents, yielding different current values for the three lines.
  • Another participant introduces a more general formula for line current calculations, noting that errors may arise with different angles between phasors.
  • A participant comments on the terminology differences between US and European electrical systems, suggesting that the interpretation of voltage levels may lead to confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and methods used, with no consensus reached on the correct approach or final values for the line currents. The discussion includes multiple competing perspectives and interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of voltage levels in different electrical systems, which may affect the calculations. Additionally, the discussion includes various mathematical approaches that have not been universally accepted.

JumpZero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I cannot find back from school, the formula to use:
A 3 phases 220Vac system, no neutral, 3300W of pure resistance load between L2 and L3, the same load between L1 and L3, nothing between L1 and L2.
What will be I1, I2, I3 the current in the 3 lines of the network?

Thanks in advance
--
Jmp0
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assume V1 = 220 / 0, V2 = 220 / 120, V3 = 220 / 240.

Calculate I23 and I13. (I23 is current from L2 to L3 ).

I2 = I23, I3 = -I23 - I13 (KCL)

I1 + I2 + I3 = 0 (KCL)

Calculate with complex numbers all the way.
 
Last edited:
I agree with Hesch except the voltages are V12=220>0,V23=220>-120,V31=220>-240[or +120] and since the load it is declared as “pure resistance” [cos(fi)=1] the currents will be:

I12=0;I23=3300/220*[(COS(-120)+SIN(-120)j];I31=3300/220*[(COS(+120)+SIN(+120)j]
upload_2015-4-28_7-52-7.png


Considering all currents “entering” position:

I1=I13=-I31=-15*[(COS(+120)+SIN(+120)j] =7.5-12.99j;I2=I23=-7.5-12.99j;I3=-I1-I2=2*12.99j=25.98j.Remark: the imaginary part of the current here it does not mean reactive part. The reactive part will be proportional with the sinus of angle between current and supplied voltage[fi] which remains 0 [in this case].

One could calculate also-following Hesch logic-using a trigonometric circle and use X and Y coordinates instead of complex number. The circle radius is equal to I=P/V=3300/220=15 [A]. Then:
upload_2015-4-28_7-52-45.png


I23X=-15*SIN(30)=-7.5[A]; I23Y=-15*SIN(60)=-12.99 [A]; I31X=-15*SIN(30)=-7.5 [A]; I31Y=+15*SIN(60)=12.99[A].

I1=I13=-I31 =7.5X-12.99Y;I2=I23=-7.5X-12.99Y;I3=-I1-I2=-(I1+I2)=2*12.99Y=25.98[A].
 
Hello,

Thanks for your answers. This is correct. I found it also (with help) with another method and result are the same:
I1=15A I2=15A I3=26A
This method:
Phase currents = I=P/E, = O amps for L1-L2 (ab) 3300/220 = 15A for L2-L3 (bc) & 15A for L3-L1 (ac)
Line currents =
L1 =√(ab²+ac²)+(ab x ac),
L2 =√(ab²+bc²)+(ab x bc),
L3 =√(ac²+bc²)+(ac x bc)

Thanks everybudy
--
Jmp0
 
It is a very interesting formulas. The complete one it is as following:

L3 =√(ac²+bc²)-2x(ac x bc)xcos(angle)

and for "angle" between ac and bc vectors[let's say "phasors"] of 120o turn it in:

L3 =√(ac²+bc²)+(ac x bc) [as you said]

As you can see for any other angle an error occurs.
 
Hesch said:
Assume V1 = 220 / 0, V2 = 220 / 120, V3 = 220 / 240.
(note my underline).
Babadag said:
I agree with Hesch except the voltages are V12=220>0
JumpZero said:
A 3 phases 220Vac system

Well, in Denmark (Europe) we operate with a phase-system (voltages and currents are as per phase) and a main-system (voltages and currents are phase to phase). So when I read "3 phases 220V", I regard 220V per phase to be meant ( V12 = 220V*√3 )?? In Europa we would write this: A 3×380V system.

I don't want to introduce a discussion about these different terms in US/EU, this is meaningless. I'm just trying to clarify the reason to some confusion
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K