Calc Angular Accel of Solid Cylinder - FxR Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter sheri1987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the angular acceleration of a solid cylinder pivoting on a frictionless bearing, the torque generated by the force pulling on the string must be determined using the equation Torque = Force * Radius. The weight of the hanging mass (6.573 N) is used to find the torque. Next, the moment of inertia for the solid cylinder must be calculated, followed by applying the relationship Torque = Moment of Inertia * Angular Acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the need to correctly identify and use the angular acceleration in the equations. Proper understanding of these concepts is essential for solving the problem accurately.
sheri1987
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement


M, a solid cylinder (M=1.67 kg, R=0.137 m) pivots on a thin, fixed, frictionless bearing. A string wrapped around the cylinder pulls downward with a force F which equals the weight of a 0.670 kg mass, i.e., F = 6.573 N. Calculate the angular acceleration of the cylinder.


2. Homework Equations

F*R ?
ang accel. = alpha*R

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I multiplied Force*Radius, cause someone told me to start with that, but I'm not sure what to do next? Do I have to use a=9.81 m/s^2? I'm not really good at this stuff so if someone could help me that would be great! thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already did use a=9.81m/s^2 when you found the weight of the hanging mass.
 
so should I still do Force * radius...then what?
 
Force*radius is torque. Then you need to find moment of inertia. Then T=I*omega. Just like F=ma, right?
 
Dick said:
Then T=I*omega. Just like F=ma, right?

I think you want I · alpha there , since alpha is angular acceleration.
 
Oh, yeah. I had a funny feeling while I was writing it. Guess I'm forgetting what greek letters look like written in english. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top