Calc2 HW Help: Solve Integral (2 + 2x - x^2)^{3/2} dx

  • Thread starter Thread starter nitroracer
  • Start date Start date
nitroracer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the Integral
\int (2 + 2x - x^2)^{3/2} dx

2. The attempt at a solution
I have looked at integration tables, u-substitution, and integration by parts but none of the above seem to be working.

U-Substitution wouldn't work because the du would be inside the integrand.
I tried parts with U=(2 + 2x - x^2)^{3/2} and DV=dx , but that result brought me back to the original integral.

What should I be using here that I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you separated out 2 + 2x - x^2 and sqrt(2 + 2x - x^2), then tried integ. by parts?
 
nitroracer said:
U-Substitution wouldn't work because the du would be inside the integrand.
I tried parts with U=(2 + 2x - x^2)^{3/2} and DV=dx , but that result brought me back to the original integral.

Have you had trigonometric substitutions yet? (Square roots or fractional exponents with 2 in the denominator are usually a sign that you'll want them.)

If you have, you'll need to do a couple of layers of substitution. You'd start by completing the square under the radical. You'll get a difference of two squares raised to the 3/2 power, or 1/2 power cubed. You'd then do a u-substitution, then the appropriate trig substitution. (It ain't going to be pretty, but integrating fractional powers of quadratic polynomials generally aren't...)

I should comment that integration by parts should only be considered if the "v du" integral you're going to get is something you actually know how to integrate (and preferably should be easier than the integral you began with -- or at worst, equally difficult, but related)...
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top