How Should Dopant Density Influence Barrier Height in Schottky Diodes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter energymover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Height
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between dopant density and barrier height in Schottky diodes, particularly in the context of a program designed to calculate current using specific equations. The original poster, Paul, notes that his barrier height function lacks consideration for dopant density, which is critical since increased dopant density influences current. A response highlights a typo in Paul's equation and suggests using a different barrier height equation that incorporates donor density. It also questions the appropriateness of the thermionic emission regime for low applied voltages, recommending the diffusion-drift equation instead. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately incorporating dopant density into the barrier height calculations for Schottky diodes.
energymover
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is this the correct place to post this? Perhaps it's more of a physics question. I'm trying to write a small program to design basic Schottky diodes. I'm using the following equation to calculate the current produced by a small applied voltage, far below Vt -->

I = A * Aast * T^2 * exp(-barrier/Vt) * exp(V/(n*Vt) - 1)

where barrier is the barrier height, A is the contact area, T is temp in kelvin, Vt is thermal voltage, V is applied voltage, n is ideality constant, and Aast is the Richardson constant -->

A = 4 * PI * q * m * k^2 / h^3

where m is the effective electron mass.

Everything seems fine except for my barrier height function, which is -->

if(ntype) {
barrier = F - Eea;
} else {
barrier = Eg - F + Eea;
}

Obviously something's missing, because there's no dopant density in the equations. An increase in dopant density will increase the current. I'm confident the current (I) equation is correct, so it must be the barrier height equation.

Any help is greatly appreciated,
Paul
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'll do my best to address this question, but take it with a grain of salt since I am not a semiconductor expert. You have a typo in your equation--the last term should read

\exp{\frac{V}{nV_t}}-1

The barrier height is

V_D=\frac{qN_d \lambda_0^2}{2\epsilon}

where Nd is the donor density and \lambda_0 is the barrier width (the point where the field drops to zero in the simple "abrupt junction" model). Henisch's book "Semiconductor Contacts" has a clear discussion of this material in Sections 2.1 to 2.2.4.

The equation you wrote, however, refers to the thermionic emission regime, where electron energy exceeds the junction barrier height. I wonder if this is inappropriate for your case where the forward applied voltage is "far below" the thermal voltage Vt. You probably want the diffusion-drift equation, which looks similar except for different (and temperature-independent) leading constants. See Henisch again, or you can check out this on-line reference
http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter3/ch3_4.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top