Calculate capacitance with a dielectric

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the final capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor with a polystyrene dielectric, the capacitor must be analyzed in three sections: the area occupied by the dielectric, the area above it filled with air, and the remaining area of the plates. Each section's capacitance cannot be simply added arithmetically; instead, the configurations must be assessed to determine which parts are in series and which are in parallel. The dielectric section effectively reduces the plate separation and modifies the area, while the air section maintains the original dimensions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the dielectric constant and significant figures in calculations. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the final capacitance.
Parad0x88
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An isolated charged parallel-plate capacitor with the plate separation d=2 mm and area of A=10 cm2 is initially empty. One slides a polystyrene dielectric slab with thickness equal to half the plate separation and with only half the area of the plates into the region between the plates. What is the final capacitance?


Homework Equations


C = κ((ε0A)/d)

Since no specification is made, I assume there is air in-between, thus use K of 1.00059 (given in a table)

Since the dielectric slab is only half the area, I convert it to 5 cm2, or 0.0025 m2

The Attempt at a Solution


(8.854e-12 X 0.0025) / 0.0001m

= 2.2135e -10
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't tell 100% what you've actually done. I'd have to say this isn't correct considering it looks like you've neglected the rest of the capacitor after the dielectric was inserted.

What it looks like to me is that you'll need to break down the capacitor into what looks like 3 partsThe part that is the same size as the dielectric, but is the air that is above it.
The dielectric part itself
The rest of the plate which isn't covered by the dielectric at all

C = εA/d2 {area is halved} + εA2/2d {area and d are halved} + kε2A/2d {area and d are halved, but has the dieletric}

It doesn't say to only focus on the area which is occupied on the dielectric
 
Liquidxlax said:
I can't tell 100% what you've actually done. I'd have to say this isn't correct considering it looks like you've neglected the rest of the capacitor after the dielectric was inserted.

What it looks like to me is that you'll need to break down the capacitor into what looks like 3 parts


The part that is the same size as the dielectric, but is the air that is above it.
The dielectric part itself
The rest of the plate which isn't covered by the dielectric at all

C = εA/d2 {area is halved} + εA2/2d {area and d are halved} + kε2A/2d {area and d are halved, but has the dieletric}

It doesn't say to only focus on the area which is occupied on the dielectric

If I try this, it gives me:

C = ε0A/2d + ε0A/d + κε0A/d (since the 2nd and third expression the 2's cancel out)

But then the unit give out something weird: C2/Nm2 X m2/m = C2m/N

I must be doing something wrong, because it's not any unit I can use. Although if the units were re-arranged, they'd give a Farad, considering I have Nm which gives J, it could theoretically give C / V, or C / J/C
 
Liquidxlax said:
What it looks like to me is that you'll need to break down the capacitor into what looks like 3 parts

The part that is the same size as the dielectric, but is the air that is above it.
The dielectric part itself
The rest of the plate which isn't covered by the dielectric at all

C = εA/d2 {area is halved} + εA2/2d {area and d are halved} + kε2A/2d {area and d are halved, but has the dielectric}

It doesn't say to only focus on the area which is occupied on the dielectric

Yes, you do need to break the capacitor into what looks like three parts.

However, you can't simply add all three capacitances arithmetically. You must consider which parts act as if they're in parallel, and which parts act as if they're in series.
 
SammyS said:
Yes, you do need to break the capacitor into what looks like three parts.

However, you can't simply add all three capacitances arithmetically. You must consider which parts act as if they're in parallel, and which parts act as if they're in series.

Wouldn't the whole system be in parallel? Considering the two plates are parallel, and then the dielectric is slid in-between the two
 
Parad0x88 said:
Wouldn't the whole system be in parallel? Considering the two plates are parallel, and then the dielectric is slid in-between the two
In a word: No.

The half with the dielectric is as if you have a capacitor, area, A/2, plate separation, d/2, with the dielectric, in series with a similar size capacitor filled with air.

By the way, considering significant digits and all, we usually take the dielectric constant or air as being 1 .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top