Calculate Cost for Most Economical Speed & Max Speed for Ship Voyage

  • Thread starter Thread starter disfused_3289
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Minimum
AI Thread Summary
The cost of operating a ship is defined by the function C(v) = 160 + (v^3)/100, where v is the speed in km/h. To find the most economical speed, calculus is used to determine that the minimum cost occurs at v = 0, leading to a base cost of $160 per hour. However, for practical applications, the distance of the journey must be considered, as it significantly impacts total costs. When the maximum speed is capped at 16 km/h, the minimum cost for a journey is calculated to be $12.56 per hour, assuming a fixed distance. The analysis emphasizes that the optimal speed for minimizing costs is consistent across varying distances.
disfused_3289
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
The cost of running a ship at a constant spped of vkm/h is 160 + (v^3)/ 100 dollars per hour.

a) Find the most economical speed for the journey, and the minimum cost.
b) If the ship were to have maximum speed of 16km/h, find what the minimum cost would be.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The cost is given as a function
C(v) = 160 + v^3 / 100
How do you find the minimum of a function?

Then what do you think you should do to get b?
 
The function you present has no minimum value due to the fact that it is cubic with no other terms. You can use calculus as follows to prove this:

C(v) = 160 + .01 * v^3
C’(v) = .03 * v^2
0 = .03 * v^2
v^2 = 0 / .03 = 0
v = ±0 = 0

The function C'(v) is the derivative of the cost function. By setting this to zero, you are solving for the extrema of the function C(v). Extrema include minimums (what you are looking for), maximums, and points of inflection. In this case, there is a point of inflection at velocity = 0 km/hour. You can check this by either graphing the function or checking the second derivative to figure out which type of extrema the point is. You should notice however that functions of the form v^3 always have a point of inflection at v=0 with no local maximums or minimums to be found.

To answer your question however based on the function, because the cost per hour gets exponentially larger the faster the ship travels, the slower the ship goes, the more cost efficient the journey will be. In fact, as the ships speed approaches zero, the cost of running the ship approaches $160 per hour. This however is assuming the cost is independent of the distance to be traveled...

...however, from reading part (a) and part (b) of your question, I assume you can use other variables to express your answer, and in this case, the distance of the journey is crucial in solving your problem (distance will be 'd'):

C(v) = 160 + .01 * v^3
t(v) = d / v

The second function there is the length of the journey given d distance and v velocity. By multiplying these functions together, you get the total cost of a journey in terms a constant (given) distance and an unknown velocity. Taking the derivative of this function then allows you to solve for the minimum cost of that journey:

C(v)*t(v) = (160 + .01 * v^3) * (d / v)
cost(v) = 160*d*v^-1 + .01*d*v^2

Knowing the distance to be a given constant you can solve for a minimum cost with velocity 'v' using the above equation. As part (b) to your question alludes, the faster the ship goes, the more cost effective it will be up until a point. In the case of 16 km/hr being the maximum speed of the ship, the following would be the minimum cost of the journey in terms of 'd' distance:

cost(v) = 160*d*v^-1 + .01*d*v^2
cost(v) = 160*d*(16)^-1 + .01*d*(16)^2
cost(v) = 10*d + 2.56*d
cost(v) = 12.56*d

In this case, the cost of running the ship is $12.56 per hour if the ship goes at its maximum speed throughout the journey. Ultimately though, the pitfall to this kind of question is over-analyzing the question using math. Compuchip's response is 'correct' in a sense of the word, but doesn't truly answer the question being asked, and the question is fairly vague and sounds like it's missing a part considering it asks about a 'journey' in part (a) but doesn't given any facts about the journey (ie distance).
 
Last edited:
The problem is probably really asking this: Find the speed that will minimize the cost over some fixed distance. If the trip takes time t, the total cost is C(v)t. If you travel a fixed distance d, the time is then d/v, so the cost is C(v) d/v. In that case, you want to minimize C(v)/v = 160/v + v2/100.Answer:
v = 20
 
Last edited:
That sounds about right; the distance should be kept in their though just in case:

C(v)*d/v = d*160/v + d*v^2/100

But yes, you can easily prove that the distance is negligible, meaning that the optimal velocity is the same for all distances.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top