Calculate Distance Traveled by Jetliner in 35 ms

  • Thread starter Thread starter DocZaius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance a commercial jetliner travels in 35 milliseconds, with a speed of 1046 kilometers per hour. The original poster correctly calculated the distance as approximately 10 meters, adhering to significant figure rules, but noted a discrepancy with the textbook's answer of 10.2 meters, which uses three significant figures. Participants argue that the textbook's answer violates the principle that the final result should not exceed the least number of significant figures in the data used for calculations. The conversation also touches on the interpretation of significant figures and the precision of the given data, suggesting that the textbook's answer is incorrect. Ultimately, the consensus is that the poster's answer is more accurate based on the rules of significant figures.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Hi,

I am using a textbook which asks: How far does a commercial jetliner (1046 kilometers/hour) go in 35 milliseconds?

The reason this isn't in the homework section is because I answered this correctly, but apparently not using the book's version of how to handle significant numbers. Maybe you can help me.

here are the calculations I did
1046 kilometers/hour * (1000 meter/1 km) * (1 hr/3600000 ms) * (35 milliseconds)
or
1046 * 1000 / 3600000 * 35 = 10.169444444444444444444444444444 -> rounded to 10 meters since 35 has 2 significant figures and the answer should have no more significant figures in a multiplication/division operation than the number with the least significant figures in it.

The answer given in the textbook is 10.2 (3 significant figures!). Why is the textbook giving 3 significant figures to the answer when a number in the multiplication/division operation clearly has no more than 3 significant numbers in it, but rather has 2. Everywhere I look, this seems to break the rule. I am told everywhere that the answer must not be more than the number in the operation with the least significant figures.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The numbers given as data, could in fact be exact, couldn't they? And what happens if I write 35ms = 35000 microseconds ?
In this case, you have not been told the precsion of the data so it's up to you how you express the answer.
 
I agree that the answer in the book broke the rule. It should be "10. meters"

To leave the final answer on a paper, I would first show too many digits and then show the act of rounding it:

x = (1046 km/hr)(1000 m/1 km)(1 hr/3600000 ms)(35 ms) = 10.16944444 m = 10. m (rounded for 2 significant digits)
 
The other way to look at it. You know the time to +/- 0.5ms or about 3% so you quote your answer to around 3% ie nearest 0.3m

Significant figures aren't necessarily the best approach, ie '10' is accurate to 10% but '98' is accurate to nearely 1% even though both have 2sig fig.
 
The book answer is (strictly) incorrect, and your answer is preferred- mikelepore's response is the ideal one.
 
[edit] Since it is a hypothetical problem, I don't think it is saying the 35 miliseconds is a measurement. It is asking you how far it would go in exactly 35 ms.

I'd ask for partial credit (if available) based on that logic.

Is this a high school physics class? I don't recall if in my elementary physics classes we bothered with sig figs. I'm not sure we did.
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top