Calculate Heat Required for 28.5g Lead Increase from 15 to 37°C

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the heat required to raise the temperature of 28.5 grams of lead from 15 to 37°C, the formula q = m*C*deltaT is used, resulting in +81.5 J. The sign of the heat value is not a concern when discussing heat required or evolved, as these terms inherently indicate the process's thermicity. However, care must be taken with signs when discussing changes in enthalpy. The convention typically assigns a negative sign to heat evolved in exothermic reactions, but it is acceptable to present the heat evolved as a positive value to avoid confusion. Clear communication of heat values is essential to prevent misunderstandings in thermodynamic discussions.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
The heat capacity of lead is 0.130 J/g C. How many joules of heat are required to raise the temperature of 28.5 grams of lead from 15 to 37?

For this problem the formula that must be used is q = m*C*deltaT, where mass is expressed in g?

q = m*C*deltaT

q = (0.130 J/g*C)*(28.5 g Pb)*(37 - 15 C) = + 81.5 J

Is my sign correct?

The formula q = m*C*deltaT, where m is expressed in grams per g/mol (Pb's molar mass), is not being asked in this question, right?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct.

When asked how much heat is required or evolved, you don't have to worry about the sign. The terms "required" and "evolved" already describe the thermicity of the process. If you are asked for the change in enthalpy, however, you must be careful with the sign.
 
Sign Conventions

For example, since "heat evolved" in these problems is used, the answer for both will be expressed with a + sign in kJ, too?


The value of the heat of reaction for the following reaction is -6535 kJ. What will be the amt. of heat in kJ evolved during the combustion of 12.0 g of C6H6?

The amt. of heat evolved for a reaction with H2 and Cl2 is -186 kJ. How many kJ of heat would evolve from reaction of 25.0 g Cl2?


Thanks.
 
Last edited:
The most commonly used convention assigns a negative sign to heat evolved (dH < 0 => exothermic). The idea is that you are trying to monitor the heat content of the system. If the system loses heat, its heat content drops, and H(fin) - H(in) < 0

However, if someone asks you "how much heat is evolved", it is unnecessary to answer with a negative number. This might make someone think that the heat is in fact absorbed (double negative). So, I dislike the wording of the second question - it is at best redundant.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top